This simply allowed me to be, as the press office of Tower Hamlets would have it "sweeping and opinionated" and "bilious" in respect of the future of our town centres and high streets.
June 2012 Archives
This simply allowed me to be, as the press office of Tower Hamlets would have it "sweeping and opinionated" and "bilious" in respect of the future of our town centres and high streets.
It started with a cup of tea and a Twix, as usual (sold to us by Beverley) and culminated in a bottle of wine with the Sheriff of Nottingham (I kid you not. I have photographic evidence, just as soon as I work out how to retrieve same from my wretched iPhone) at the Via Fosse.
These ladies give town planning a good name. I was so impressed with them all, felt so very reinforced, felt so much that - ahem - lead had been put back in my pencil (do forgive totally inappropriate sexist expression), that I Tweeted on the tube on the way home that the "brainy birds" should be "put in charge of running the country". Whereupon that well known wag, Richard Aylwin, in a reference to the nursery rhyme, responded to say they might "swoop down and peck off your nose"! Well, he's a surveyor and a journalist, and he's ambivalent about planners (although rather keen on women I'd have said).
But I am reminded that it isn't always all a hotbed of positivity over on the east side. There is, of course, that very special vortex of madness, that place which sensible people would all do well to avoid; that borough of which only the brave dare speak the name, a little like that of Lord Voldemort. It is the rightful heir to the shenanigans at Liverpool and Lambeth of the 1980s. I speak, but of course, of... Tower Hamlets.
It is a half-day conference, starting at 2pm and finishing (with drinks) at 5.15pm. And we find we are a little in demand. I wrote to the target audience promising "energetic and pacy" content, with some quick fire sessions, to provide a thoroughly focused opportunity to discuss East London, not just in the run-up to the Olympics but also - and more crucially really - in this strange new economy in which we find ourselves!
The second in the BBC2 series "The Secret Life of Streets" aired last night. And the BBC are to be totally commended on this piece of thought provoking programme commissioning. But, whilst last night's was an interesting programme, featuring Camberwell Grove (surely one of the finest streets in London), and dealing with issues of 1960s alternative lifestyles and gentrification, it was nothing like as moving as last week's broadcast on the "slum clearance" around Deptford High Street (see my blog).
But last week's programme also caused a furore. I was very pleased that David Knight posted a comment on this blog, putting me right on the position of Nicholas Taylor (btw not to be confused with the silver fox lawyer of the same name who used to sit at Godfrey Bradman's right hand). As David says (of my piece) "the argument stated here was exactly the one Taylor was trying to make, on this documentary and more importantly in his book "The Village in the City" (1973), which was a condemnation of the kind of planning that the documentary, er, condemns. The portrayal of Taylor in this documentary as exactly the kind of planner he tilted against is appalling".
The
debate around "Generation Rent" continues to ramp up. My recent blog (29
May) on the private rented sector seems to have met with some approval; I got
several approbatory Tweets and regular readers will have already seen the
comment posted by the eminent Kevin Leigh of No 5 Chambers (so big sigh of
relief there!)
Last week, alongside some rather scary statistics on what they call
"rental-spend", Rightmove published a report that said that those "happy to
rent" are on the increase; although most remain what is termed "trapped
renters" (56%), that is, those who would like to buy but cannot afford to
(incidentally you can see a whole new array of quasi-technical terms growing up
around this debate. Just what are we like? It's depressing, to say
the least).
Kelvin famously has a passionate interest in the future of towns and cities and is indefatigable really, having written government policy, published numerous books and articles on the subject and regularly speaking at conferences and advising a number of cities on design matters.
I'm no royalist, but I was rather charmed by the Diamond Jubilee, in the main. I couldn't face the ghastly concert thing (Macca and "Oh-bla-di" I ask you!!!), but I watched the whole of the wet flotilla. And in common with most of us I suspect, I was not charmed by the inane coverage by the BBC, (rightly slammed for being fatuous, dumbed-down and gratuitously jolly), but hugely charmed by the central figure, our tiny monarch, her staunch professionalism, her radiant smile through it all. But didn't it go on and on? A wonderful Tweet went out yesterday which read "Day 4 of bloody Jubilee. Now everybody knows how it feels to sit through an Indian wedding". You have to laugh.
