<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>The Office Gossip</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:www.estatesgazette.com,2009-09-01:/blogs/london-office-database//78</id>
    <updated>2010-07-28T09:53:43Z</updated>
    
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Enterprise 4.32-en</generator>

<entry>
    <title>Will L &amp; G&apos;s tenants go green? </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/2010/07/will-l-gs-tenants-go-green.html" />
    <id>tag:www.estatesgazette.com,2010:/blogs/london-office-database//78.170066</id>

    <published>2010-07-28T09:45:02Z</published>
    <updated>2010-07-28T09:53:43Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[Legal &amp; General, who owns many London office assets, has launched an 'Office Occupiers Guide to Sustainability',&nbsp;in order&nbsp;to arm its office tenants with the necessary understanding of the environmental impact of property, and a toolkit to implement change. The guide...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jennifer Islip</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="London Occupiers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.legalandgeneralmediacentre.com/Press-Releases/Legal-General-launches-Office-Occupiers-Guide-to-Sustainability-as-Mayor-recognises-work-with-tenants-in-the-battle-against-climate-change-2e0.aspx">Legal &amp; General</a>, who owns many London office assets, has launched an 'Office Occupiers Guide to Sustainability',&nbsp;in order&nbsp;to arm its office tenants with the necessary understanding of the environmental impact of property, and a toolkit to implement change. </p>
<p>The guide represents just one of many substantial commitments to the green agenda that the company has made over the past&nbsp;year and for which it has been receiving growing recognition. This commitment was recognised last month when&nbsp;it received two Gold awards at the Mayor of London's Green Awards 2010, in conjunction with the Better Buildings Partnership ("BBP"). These were the Building Improver Award, for its work at 99 Gresham Street, and the Green Portfolio Award. </p>
<p>As one of the largest UK institutional property fund managers, with over £8.7bn of property assets under management, LGP is very serious about its role in minimising the impact of the built environment and setting an example of best practice for other property owners and managers. Yet what will the tenant's think and can the policy actually be realistically implemented?&nbsp; </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>One New Change&apos;s police force</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/2010/07/one-new-changes-police-force.html" />
    <id>tag:www.estatesgazette.com,2010:/blogs/london-office-database//78.170033</id>

    <published>2010-07-27T14:44:00Z</published>
    <updated>2010-07-27T14:45:50Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[ &nbsp; &nbsp; The Financial Times has reported that companies choosing to occupy the office and retail scheme, One New Change, could be asked to pay for the area's own dedicated police force. A year-long trial of the initiative elsewhere...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Gemma Kennedy</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="London Buildings" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="London Occupiers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="cityoflondon" label="city of london" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="financialtimes" label="Financial Times" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="landsecurities" label="Land Securities" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="onenewchange" label="One New Change" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="police" label="police" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/">
        <![CDATA[<font size="2">
<p align="left"><em><img class="mt-image-left" style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 20px 20px 0px" height="336" alt="Thumbnail image for policeman.jpg" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/assets_c/2010/07/policeman-thumb-336x336-83937-thumb-336x336-83938.jpg" width="336" /></em></p>
<p align="left"><em></em>&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left"><em></em>&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left"><em>The Financial Times</em> has reported that companies choosing to occupy the office and retail scheme, <a href="http://www.onenewchange.com/">One New Change</a>, could be asked to pay for the area's own dedicated police force. A year-long trial of the initiative elsewhere in London showed that many tenants are happy to pay for tighter security. Provided by the City of London police, it is hoped that the five-strong unit will offer additional protection against a number of risks, including terrorism. </p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">With hopes that the&nbsp;development (set to open this Autumn) will become the next hot shopping destination, the move could be welcomed by retailers and office occupants alike. Not everyone will be happy about this development though; security companies could lose big contracts to the public sector, as the police force thinks of more innovative ways to raise revenue in these times of public sector spending cuts.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>For the full story, see <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b5e90264-9281-11df-9142-00144feab49a.html">here</a>.</p></font>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Heron Quays West gets go-ahead</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/2010/07/heron-quays-west-gets-go-ahead.html" />
    <id>tag:www.estatesgazette.com,2010:/blogs/london-office-database//78.169574</id>

    <published>2010-07-22T10:42:00Z</published>
    <updated>2010-07-22T10:42:20Z</updated>

    <summary> Canary Wharf Group will be celebrating this week, as the saga of its Heron Quays West development finally draws to a close. The developer has been working on this scheme since 2001 to build three more office towers in...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Gemma Kennedy</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Construction/Demolition" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Development" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="London Buildings" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="London Occupiers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="canarywharfgroup" label="Canary Wharf Group" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="docklands" label="Docklands" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="heronquayswest" label="Heron Quays West" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="michaelgross" label="Michael Gross" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="michaelhunt" label="Michael Hunt" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="towerhamletscouncil" label="Tower Hamlets council" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/HeronQuayWest.jpg"><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="442" alt="HeronQuayWest.jpg" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/assets_c/2010/07/HeronQuayWest-thumb-480x442-83260.jpg" width="480" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.canarywharf.com/mainfrm1.asp">Canary Wharf Group</a> will be celebrating this week, as the saga of its Heron Quays West development finally draws to a close. The developer has been working on this scheme since 2001 to build three more office towers in Docklands.</p>
<p>Michael Hunt and Michael Gross, owners of two buildings located on the site, turned down offers of £5m each for their land and raised their objections when Tower Hamlets ordered them to&nbsp;proceed with the sales.&nbsp;Now, after taking the council to a public&nbsp;inquiry in 2009, they have finally dropped&nbsp;their opposition.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<p>It is not yet known when building works&nbsp;will commence but <a href="http://www.docklands24.co.uk/content/docklands/default/default.aspx">The Docklands</a> newspaper reports that Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank and UBS have been mentioned as prospective occupiers.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Goldman Sachs profits tumble</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/2010/07/goldman-sachs-profits-tumble.html" />
    <id>tag:www.estatesgazette.com,2010:/blogs/london-office-database//78.169439</id>

    <published>2010-07-21T08:31:03Z</published>
    <updated>2010-07-21T08:43:36Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[Trouble may be looming for investment bank Goldman Sacks as the Financial Times reports&nbsp;the banks'&nbsp;quarterly profits plunged 83% in the second quarter to $453m. Equity trading suffered even more, falling 89% to $235m.&nbsp; The Goldman's chief executive Lloyd Blankfein, said...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jennifer Islip</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="London Occupiers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Trouble may be looming for investment bank <a href="http://www2.goldmansachs.com/">Goldman Sacks</a> as the <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/0a5669e0-93fe-11df-83ad-00144feab49a.html">Financial Times </a>reports&nbsp;the banks'&nbsp;quarterly profits plunged 83% in the second quarter to $453m. Equity trading suffered even more, falling 89% to $235m.&nbsp; </p>
<p>The Goldman's chief executive Lloyd Blankfein, said "the market environment became more difficult during the second quarter and, as a result, client activity across our businesses declined".</p>
<p>The bank also set aside more than $1bn for the UK bonus tax and penalties it agreed to pay last week to settle with the Securities and Exchange Commission. To offset the lower profits and expenditures, will we see any of its office space, within its six London office buildings, come onto the market in the next few months? We will wait and see. <br /></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>JP Morgan&apos;s doubts continue</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/2010/07/jp-morgans-doubts-continue.html" />
    <id>tag:www.estatesgazette.com,2010:/blogs/london-office-database//78.169157</id>

    <published>2010-07-19T14:14:42Z</published>
    <updated>2010-07-19T14:14:40Z</updated>

    <summary> Further to my blog on 6th July, JP Morgan&apos;s Riverside South scheme looks in danger of being scrapped once again after reports that the bank is concerned about London&apos;s future as one of the world&apos;s top financial cities. Austerity...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Gemma Kennedy</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Construction/Demolition" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="London Buildings" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="London Occupiers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="borisjohnson" label="Boris Johnson" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="canarywharf" label="canary wharf" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="jpmorgan" label="JP Morgan" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="riversidesouth" label="Riverside South" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/">
        <![CDATA[<font size="2"><font size="2">
<p><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/Riverside%20south%20blog.JPG"><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="533" alt="Riverside south blog.JPG" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/assets_c/2008/11/Riverside%20south%20blog-thumb-850x533-16081.jpg" width="850" /></a>Further to my blog on <a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/2010/07/-whilst-out-site-visiting.html">6th July</a>, JP Morgan's Riverside South scheme looks in danger of being scrapped once again after reports that the bank is concerned about London's future as one of the world's top financial cities. Austerity measures and crippling regulations haven't done much to persuade the bank to remain in the UK and it now appears that the direction of the business could change altogether. According to the Telegraph, JP Morgan sees its future in Asia rather than London and offices in Bournemouth and Glasgow could also face the axe. The bank has raised its concerns with Boris Johnson and is even understood to have warned Alistair Darling in a phone call last year.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>If JP Morgan does decide to pull out of the scheme, Canary Wharf Group will be entitled to payment for works completed so far, as well as a contractual break fee of £76m. CWG is not willing to build the project speculatively so if JP Morgan pulls out, the site is likely to remain vacant for some time. According to City AM, the approximate deadline for a decision is the end of the year.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>For more on the story, see <a href="http://www.cityam.com/news-and-analysis/new-hq-plans-under-threat-jp%E2%80%88morgan">City AM</a> and the <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/7897408/JP-Morgan-may-quit-UK-over-Governments-bank-levy.html">Telegraph</a>.</p></font></font>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Banking and Biscuits (for your dog)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/2010/07/banking-and-biscuits-for-your.html" />
    <id>tag:www.estatesgazette.com,2010:/blogs/london-office-database//78.168561</id>

    <published>2010-07-15T08:48:26Z</published>
    <updated>2010-07-15T08:48:54Z</updated>

    <summary> Back in February 2009, we were informed of a letting to a company called Metro Bank. It took the entire 21,000 sq ft first floor of 1 Southampton Row, WC1, on a sixteen-year lease and was reported to be...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Gemma Kennedy</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="London Buildings" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="London Occupiers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="anthonythomson" label="Anthony Thomson" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="banking" label="banking" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="bbc" label="BBC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="fsa" label="FSA" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="metrobank" label="Metro Bank" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="southamptonrow" label="Southampton Row" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/">
        <![CDATA[<font size="2">
<p>Back in February 2009, we were informed of a letting to a company called <a href="http://www.metrobankonline.co.uk/metro.html">Metro Bank</a>. It took the entire 21,000 sq ft first floor of 1 Southampton Row, WC1, on a sixteen-year lease and was reported to be paying £60 per sq ft. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/1%20Southampton%20Row.JPG"><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="336" alt="1 Southampton Row.JPG" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/assets_c/2010/07/1%20Southampton%20Row-thumb-448x336-82455.jpg" width="448" /></a>&nbsp;</p>
<p>For months we wondered, "Where is this bank from?" and more importantly, "Who opens a new bank in the middle of a recession?" But over a year on, following a lengthy approval process with the Financial Services Authority and a refurbishment of over £2m, this British investment-backed bank is set to open the doors to its first branch on 29th July. Metro Bank hopes to bring some unique touches to the process of banking; sparkly customer toilets, free coin-counting machines and exactly what everyone needs when banking, biscuits for your dog. The branch will be open from 8am until 8pm and also at weekends and it's said that cashiers will not sit behind security screens.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/http:/www.metrobankonline.co.uk/metro.html/logo.png"><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="192" alt="logo.png" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/assets_c/2010/07/logo-thumb-410x192-82453.png" width="410" /></a>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Three more stores are planned for Earl's Court, Borehamwood and Fulham Broadway but the bank will have some way to go if it is to attract new customers. It is certainly not easy to switch to a different bank, but the bank's chairman Anthony Thomson told the <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/10614802">BBC</a>, "Consumers don't need convincing. There's a huge pent-up demand for better service. Banking has been a cosy oligolpoly for too long. People will vote with their feet." However, reports that interest rates will not be as competitive may outweigh the customer-focused approach that the bank will take.</p></font>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>June disappointing for commercial development</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/2010/07/june-disappointing-for-commerc.html" />
    <id>tag:www.estatesgazette.com,2010:/blogs/london-office-database//78.167886</id>

    <published>2010-07-12T11:01:36Z</published>
    <updated>2010-07-12T11:01:40Z</updated>

    <summary>A report produced by Savills explained that June saw the lowest level of UK commercial development in nearly a year. With continuing fears of a double-dip recession and large cuts in public sector spending, it is likely that the development...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Gemma Kennedy</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Construction/Demolition" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Development" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="London Buildings" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="London Occupiers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="commercialproperty" label="commercial property" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="developers" label="developers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="developmentconfidence" label="development confidence" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="london" label="london" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="savills" label="Savills" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/">
        <![CDATA[<p>A report produced by <a href="http://www.savills.co.uk/">Savills</a> explained that June saw the lowest level of UK commercial development in nearly a year. With continuing fears of a double-dip recession and large cuts in public sector spending, it is likely that the development sector will remain subdued for some time to come. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>In terms of central London commercial property, we are experiencing some activity and developer's confidence seems to be growing. With reports that the Heron Tower is close to securing its first pre-let to law firm McDermott Will &amp; Emery and the London Bridge Quarter consortium's deal with TfL to push for a higher rent, it looks like the situation in London&nbsp;isn't so bad. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>But&nbsp;can this continue? </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>As schemes such as Central St Giles face completion without any tenants, occupiers are going to have much more choice. The possibility of the development pipeline drying up seems ever more real, which will mean severe stock shortage in the years to come. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>For more on Savills report, see <a href="http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard-business/article-23855053-commercial-development-falls-to-lowest-level-in-11-months.do">here</a>.&nbsp;</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Carlyle Group to purchase a piece of White Tower</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/2010/07/carlyle-to-purchase-a-piece-of.html" />
    <id>tag:www.estatesgazette.com,2010:/blogs/london-office-database//78.167639</id>

    <published>2010-07-09T09:42:11Z</published>
    <updated>2010-07-09T09:43:00Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[ The Carlyle Group confirmed yesterday that contracts have been exchanged to purchase part of Simon Halabi's former White Tower portfolio. Comprising five central London properties and one in Chiswick, Carlyle will acquire the portfolio for £671m. &nbsp; The properties...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Gemma Kennedy</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="London Buildings" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="ibm" label="IBM" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="jpmorgan" label="JP Morgan" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="simonhalabi" label="Simon Halabi" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="thecarlylegroup" label="The Carlyle Group" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="ubs" label="UBS" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="whitetower" label="White Tower" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/">
        <![CDATA[<font size="2">
<p><a href="http://www.carlyle.com/Media%20Room/News%20Archive/2010/item11033.html">The Carlyle Group</a> confirmed yesterday that contracts have been exchanged to purchase part of Simon Halabi's former White Tower portfolio. Comprising five central London properties and one in Chiswick, Carlyle will acquire the portfolio for £671m. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The properties are let to tenants including JP Morgan Chase, IBM and UBS and generate over £62m per annum in rent. Carlyle European Real Estate was launched back in June 2008 and takes a long-term approach to investment, concentrating on European centres and landmark assets. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The portfolio comprises the following properties:</p>
<p>BSI Tower, Chiswick High Road, W4</p>
<p>60 Victoria Embankment, EC4</p>
<p><a href="http://www.egi.co.uk/Research/LODBuildingDetail.aspx?hdnSelectedIDList=5487"><img class="mt-image-left" style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 20px 20px 0px" height="480" alt="60victoriaembankment.JPG" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/60victoriaembankment.JPG" width="640" /></a></p>
<p>Ludgate House, 245 Blackfriars Road, SE1</p>
<p><a href="http://www.egi.co.uk/Research/LODBuildingDetail.aspx?hdnSelectedIDList=10635"><img class="mt-image-left" style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 20px 20px 0px" height="448" alt="ludgatehouse.JPG" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/ludgatehouse.JPG" width="332" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Sampson House, 64 Hopton Street, SE1</p>
<p><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/sampsonhouse.JPG"><img class="mt-image-left" style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 20px 20px 0px" height="480" alt="sampsonhouse.JPG" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/assets_c/2010/07/sampsonhouse-thumb-640x480-81599.jpg" width="640" /></a></p>
<p>Millennium Bridge House, 1 High Timber Street, EC4<a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/millenniumbridgehouse.JPG"><img class="mt-image-left" style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 20px 20px 0px" height="400" alt="millenniumbridgehouse.JPG" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/assets_c/2010/07/millenniumbridgehouse-thumb-602x400-81601.jpg" width="602" /></a></p>
<p>Alban Gate, 125 London Wall, EC2</p>
<p><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/albangate.JPG"><img class="mt-image-left" style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 20px 20px 0px" height="480" alt="albangate.JPG" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/assets_c/2010/07/albangate-thumb-640x480-81603.jpg" width="640" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>CB Richard Ellis is advising on the sale of other White Tower assets. </p></font>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>JP Morgan&apos;s HQ in question</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/2010/07/-whilst-out-site-visiting.html" />
    <id>tag:www.estatesgazette.com,2010:/blogs/london-office-database//78.166960</id>

    <published>2010-07-06T13:46:31Z</published>
    <updated>2010-07-06T13:46:57Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[ Whilst out site visiting in Docklands, we thought it best to check out what was happening with Riverside South, JP Morgan's long-awaited HQ-to-be... or, by the looks of it, not-to-be. &nbsp; Although JP Morgan agreed to move here at...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Gemma Kennedy</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Construction/Demolition" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="London Buildings" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="London Occupiers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="canarywharf" label="canary wharf" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="docklands" label="docklands" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="jpmorgan" label="JP Morgan" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="riversidesouth" label="Riverside South" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/">
        <![CDATA[<font size="2">
<p>Whilst out site visiting in Docklands, we thought it best to check out what was happening with Riverside South, JP Morgan's long-awaited HQ-to-be... or, by the looks of it, not-to-be. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Although JP Morgan agreed to move here at the end of 2008, there have been numerous rumours that it could move to the City instead and that the scheme could be scrapped altogether. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Of course, nobody knows for sure but if our last visit is anything to go by, things aren't looking too good. Construction seems to have come to a standstill in recent months. Perhaps following the huge bail-outs with tax payers money, now just isn't the right time to spend $3bn on a brand-spanking new building. We'll keep you posted...</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="193" alt="riversidesouth.JPG" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/riversidesouth.JPG" width="135" /></p></font>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Will the England match affect productivity in London?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/2010/06/will-the-england-match-affect.html" />
    <id>tag:www.estatesgazette.com,2010:/blogs/london-office-database//78.164768</id>

    <published>2010-06-23T09:51:02Z</published>
    <updated>2010-06-23T09:54:45Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[&nbsp; With England's key match due to kick-off at 3pm today will London office workers be flocking to the local pub? The answer is probably yes, at least for employees of large firms such as HSBC who are offering flexible...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jennifer Islip</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="London Occupiers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/">
        <![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left"><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="158" alt="photo_1276361148566-1-1.jpg" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/photo_1276361148566-1-1.jpg" width="245" />With England's key match due to kick-off at 3pm today will London office workers be flocking to the local pub? The answer is probably yes, at least for employees of large firms such as HSBC who are offering flexible working options. <a href="http://www.docklands24.co.uk/content/docklands/news/story.aspx?brand=Docklands&amp;category=news&amp;tBrand=docklands&amp;tCategory=znews&amp;itemid=WeED22%20Jun%202010%2017%3A53%3A06%3A140">Docklands24</a> say bars are expected to be packed from lunchtime onwards for the first England World Cup 2010 game to be shown during office hours. </p>
<p>Unions have urged companies across London to let staff have the time off, although business leaders have warned many smaller firms simply cannot afford a drop in productivity. </p>
<p>A survey of London employers has shown that the majority (62 per cent) will not be making any special provisions to allow staff to watch the game. </p>
<p>Of those employers that said they will let staff watch the match, 13 per cent said they would screen it at work, 12 per cent said they would allow people to leave the office, and a further 12 per cent indicated employees would be able to watch on their computer. </p>
<p><br />&nbsp;</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>25 Churchill Place</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/2010/06/25-churchill-place.html" />
    <id>tag:www.estatesgazette.com,2010:/blogs/london-office-database//78.164636</id>

    <published>2010-06-22T13:34:21Z</published>
    <updated>2010-06-22T13:32:30Z</updated>

    <summary> The saga of 25 Churchill Place, E14, took another turn last week as planning permission was granted for the construction of a 19 storey building, providing around 56,935 net sq m (612,848 net sq ft). This may not seem...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Gemma Kennedy</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Construction/Demolition" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Development" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="London Buildings" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="canarywharf" label="canary wharf" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="churchillplace" label="churchill place" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="docklands" label="docklands" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="planning" label="planning" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/">
        <![CDATA[<font size="2">
<p>The saga of 25 Churchill Place, E14, took another turn last week as planning permission was granted for the construction of a 19 storey building, providing around 56,935 net sq m (612,848 net sq ft). This may not seem like anything out of the ordinary, but the site already has permission for two other buildings - one of 15 storeys and the other of 23. Any of the three proposed buildings could be built and it would seem that the latest design is a compromise between the two previous permissions.</p>
<p>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/LowRise.jpg"><img class="mt-image-left" style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 20px 20px 0px" height="336" alt="LowRise.jpg" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/assets_c/2010/06/LowRise-thumb-339x336-79782.jpg" width="339" /></a></p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;Original 1990's permission</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left"><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/HighRise%202008.jpg"><img class="mt-image-left" style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 20px 20px 0px" height="336" alt="HighRise 2008.jpg" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/assets_c/2010/06/HighRise%202008-thumb-339x336-79784.jpg" width="339" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>2008 permission&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/MidRise%202010.jpg"><img class="mt-image-left" style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 20px 20px 0px" height="336" alt="MidRise 2010.jpg" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/assets_c/2010/06/MidRise%202010-thumb-338x336-79786.jpg" width="338" /></a></p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">2010 permission&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p><font size="2">
<p align="left"><font size="2"></font>&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left"><font size="2"></font>&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left"><font size="2"></font>&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left"><font size="2"></font>&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left"><font size="2">Two prospective tenants have previously been linked to the scheme. Aon placed the building under offer back in 2006 but decided to remain in the City. Then, in 2008, News International opted not to prelet the building.&nbsp;Jones Lang LaSalle and&nbsp;CB Richard Ellis have&nbsp;been retained as letting agents, although&nbsp;the space is currently not being actively marketed. </p>
<p align="left">According to the most recent planning app, the building will look like this when completed:</font></p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/assets_c/2010/06/facade-thumb-316x448-79788.jpg"><img class="mt-image-left" style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 20px 20px 0px" height="448" alt="Thumbnail image for facade.jpg" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/assets_c/2010/06/facade-thumb-316x448-79788-thumb-316x448-79789.jpg" width="316" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" align="left">Activity in Docklands has been picking up over recent months so perhaps it will be third time lucky for developer Canary Wharf Group and it will secure a pre-let soon. </p>
<p dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" align="left">For more information on the planning application, see&nbsp;<a href="http://194.201.98.213/WAM/findCaseFile.do?appNumber=PA%2F10%2F00332">Tower Hamlets</a>'s online planning register&nbsp;or <a href="http://194.201.98.213/WAM/doc/Design%20&amp;%20Access%20Statement-547354.pdf?extension=.pdf&amp;id=547354&amp;appid=&amp;location=VOLUME4&amp;contentType=application/pdf&amp;pageCount=1">here</a>&nbsp;for the Design &amp; Access statement.&nbsp; </font></font></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Shard waves goodbye to pre-let</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/2010/06/shard-waves-goodbye-to-pre-let.html" />
    <id>tag:www.estatesgazette.com,2010:/blogs/london-office-database//78.163463</id>

    <published>2010-06-16T15:31:34Z</published>
    <updated>2010-06-16T15:42:25Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[As you may have heard by now, the big news this week is that Transport for London will no longer be moving into the Shard. &nbsp; &nbsp; TfL took around 240,000 sq ft on a 25-year lease back in August...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Gemma Kennedy</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Construction/Demolition" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="London Buildings" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="London Occupiers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="londonbridge" label="London Bridge" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="londonoffices" label="london offices" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="qatar" label="Qatar" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="sellarproperty" label="Sellar Property" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="shardofglass" label="Shard of Glass" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="tfl" label="TfL" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="transportforlondon" label="Transport for London" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/">
        <![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 5pt 0cm; mso-pagination: none; mso-layout-grid-align: none"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-font-kerning: 18.0pt"><font color="#000000">As you may have heard by now, the big news this week is that <a href="http://www.tfl.gov.uk/corporate/media/newscentre/15767.aspx"><em>Transport for <st1:City w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">London</st1:place></st1:City></em></a><em> </em>will no longer be moving into the <a href="http://www.shardlondonbridge.com/">Shard</a>.</font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 5pt 0cm; mso-pagination: none; mso-layout-grid-align: none"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-font-kerning: 18.0pt"></span>&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 5pt 0cm; mso-pagination: none; mso-layout-grid-align: none"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-font-kerning: 18.0pt"><font color="#000000"><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/shard.jpg"><font color="#000000"></font><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="448" alt="shard.jpg" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/assets_c/2009/04/shard-thumb-255x448-33179.jpg" width="255" /></a>&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 5pt 0cm; mso-pagination: none; mso-layout-grid-align: none"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-font-kerning: 18.0pt"><font color="#000000"><em>TfL</em> took around 240,000 sq ft on a 25-year lease back in August 2006 and would have paid £39 per sq ft. But now <em>The London Bridge Quarter</em>, a joint venture between the <em>State of Qatar </em>and <em>Sellar Property Group</em>, has bought the lease back in a multi-million pound deal. It is thought that positioning the development at the top end of the market will enable <em>LBQ</em> to achieve a much higher rent. <o:p></o:p></font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 5pt 0cm; mso-pagination: none; mso-layout-grid-align: none"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-font-kerning: 18.0pt"><font color="#000000">As for <em>TfL... </em>the company says that it will continue to occupy its current portfolio and will review its options. As part of the deal, <em>Sellar Property </em>is helping it to find a replacement office, into which it might consolidate its numerous small offices across <st1:City w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">London</st1:place></st1:City>. However, it seems as though relocation plans have been put on hold, with savings of around £160m planned.<o:p></o:p></font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 5pt 0cm; mso-pagination: none; mso-layout-grid-align: none"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-font-kerning: 18.0pt"><font color="#000000">Any suggestions on who will move here next?<o:p></o:p></font></span></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Investments in a nutshell</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/2010/06/investments-in-a-nutshell.html" />
    <id>tag:www.estatesgazette.com,2010:/blogs/london-office-database//78.162791</id>

    <published>2010-06-11T15:00:31Z</published>
    <updated>2010-06-11T15:15:25Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[This week has seen a flurry of investment activity and so I thought it best to summarise some of the latest events... &nbsp; Let's begin with the withdrawals. Perhaps most significantly, Warburg-Henderson decided this week to withdraw 3 Bunhill Row,...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Gemma Kennedy</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="London Buildings" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="London Occupiers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="availability" label="availability" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="investment" label="investment" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="londonoffices" label="london offices" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="underoffer" label="under offer" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/">
        <![CDATA[<p>This week has seen a flurry of investment activity and so I thought it best to summarise some of the latest events... </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Let's begin with the withdrawals. Perhaps most significantly, <a href="http://www.warburg-henderson.com/welcome_e.html">Warburg-Henderson</a> decided this week to withdraw <a href="http://egi.co.uk/Research/LODBuildingSearch.aspx?NavigationID=12758">3 Bunhill Row, EC1</a> from the market following fluctuations in currencies. With so much uncertainty surrounding the Eurozone and its currency, this is hardly surprising. Elsewhere, Shieldpoint withdrew City property <a href="http://egi.co.uk/Research/LODBuildingSearch.aspx?NavigationID=2561">12 Arthur Street, EC4</a>&nbsp;after receiving offers below the £70m asking price. A private investor also&nbsp;decided to withdraw <a href="http://egi.co.uk/Research/LODBuildingSearch.aspx?NavigationID=115">21 Lombard Street, EC3</a>, despite the fact that the building had been placed under offer by private equity firm <a href="http://www.orioncapital.com/">Orion Capital Partners</a> for around £103m. <a href="http://www.hdgmansur.com/HDG-Mansur-Group-Investment.asp">HDG Mansur Investment Services</a>&nbsp;has also changed it plan to sell&nbsp;<a href="http://egi.co.uk/Research/LODBuildingSearch.aspx?NavigationID=25743">169 Union Street, SE1</a>, after agreeing a further 17-year lease with the <a href="http://www.london-fire.gov.uk/">London Fire &amp; Emergency Planning Authority</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp; </p>
<p>But some vendors have been more successful. <a href="http://www.helical.co.uk/">Helical Bar</a> announced today that is has completed the acquisition of two neighbouring properties; <a href="http://egi.co.uk/Research/LODBuildingSearch.aspx?NavigationID=4168">1 Mitre Square</a> and <a href="http://egi.co.uk/Research/LODBuildingSearch.aspx?NavigationID=980">International House, 26-28 Creechurch Lane</a>, both EC3. With planning permission already granted for around 400,000 sq ft of offices to be&nbsp;built here, Helical Bar must be feeling very pleased indeed. Interestingly, the freehold for 1 Mitre Square will be transferred to the <a href="http://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/Corporation">City of London</a> and HB will be the long leaseholder for the entire site. Elsewhere, it seems that the Greeks still have some cash to splash after another City property, <a href="http://egi.co.uk/Research/LODBuildingSearch.aspx?NavigationID=38">5 Laurence Pountney Hill, EC4</a>, was sold a private Greek investor for more than £90m. <a href="http://www.avivainvestors.co.uk/">Aviva Investors</a> is also said to have purchased the <a href="http://www.thefa.com/">FA</a>'s former HQ, <a href="http://egi.co.uk/Research/LODBuildingSearch.aspx?NavigationID=2594">23-25 Soho Square, W1</a>, for around £39m.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>And it looks as though there's much more to come in the way of investment sales, with several properties going under offer this week. <a href="http://www.gpe.co.uk/">Great Portland Estates</a> is said to be under offer to purchase <a href="http://egi.co.uk/Research/LODBuildingSearch.aspx?NavigationID=1687">35 Portman Square, W1</a>, in an off-market deal with <a href="http://www.warnford.co.uk/">Warnford Investments</a>. GPE must be keen to add this to its portfolio after a failed attempt to purchase it back in 2007. <a href="http://www.mgpa.com/">MGPA</a> is reportedly under offer to purchase <a href="http://egi.co.uk/Research/LODBuildingSearch.aspx?NavigationID=918">Exchange Towers 1 &amp; 2, E14</a>&nbsp;for close to the £145m asking price. Vendor <a href="http://www.hammerson.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=133289&amp;p=index">Hammerson</a> has been in talks with a number of parties, such as <a href="http://www.resolution.org.uk/">Resolution</a> and <a href="http://www.chg.org.uk/">Catalyst</a>, despite only putting them up for sale three months ago. And Simon Halabi's old White Tower portfolio is close to being sold, after global investment firm <a href="http://www.carlyle.com/">Carlyle Group</a> was selected by <a href="http://www.cbre.co.uk/uk_en">CB Richard Ellis Loan Servicing</a> as the preferred bidder. The five properties are <a href="http://egi.co.uk/Research/LODBuildingSearch.aspx?NavigationID=949">Alban Gate, EC2</a>, <a href="http://egi.co.uk/Research/LODBuildingSearch.aspx?NavigationID=3232">60 Victoria Embankment, EC4</a>, <a href="http://egi.co.uk/Research/LODBuildingSearch.aspx?NavigationID=5487">Ludgate House </a>and <a href="http://egi.co.uk/Research/LODBuildingSearch.aspx?NavigationID=10635">Sampson House</a>, both SE1 and BSI Tower, W4.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Poor <a href="http://egi.co.uk/Research/LODBuildingSearch.aspx?NavigationID=77">Drapers Gardens, EC2</a>&nbsp;may be feeling rejected after <a href="https://www.deka.de/decontent/index.jsp">Deka</a> pulled out of purchasing the property as part of its plan to withdraw from around £400m of investment deals. The scheme shouldn't be too downhearted though, as EG hears that <a href="http://www.aerium.com/">Aerium</a> and <a href="http://www.luminareal.com/">Lumina Real Estate</a> are just two parties thought to be waiting in the wings.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>If you're feeling left out and want to bag yourself an investment too, look no further than <a href="http://egi.co.uk/Research/LODBuildingSearch.aspx?NavigationID=124">120 Fleet Street, EC4</a> - on the market for a mere £300m. A group of private Irish investors plans to sell this building, which is let to <a href="http://www2.goldmansachs.com/">Goldman Sachs</a> for a further 15 years and is subject to an imminent rent review.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>So there you&nbsp;have it,&nbsp;London property&nbsp;investment in a nutshell.&nbsp;<a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/nutshell.jpg"><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="336" alt="nutshell.jpg" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/assets_c/2010/06/nutshell-thumb-403x336-78543.jpg" width="403" /></a><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/nutshell.jpg"></a></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>SW8, 9 &amp; 11</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/2010/06/sw8-9-11.html" />
    <id>tag:www.estatesgazette.com,2010:/blogs/london-office-database//78.160821</id>

    <published>2010-06-03T15:53:11Z</published>
    <updated>2010-06-03T15:53:27Z</updated>

    <summary> Yesterday, we visited the next stop on our magical mystery tour of London&apos;s outer postcodes; SW8, SW9 and SW11. As hard as it was to spend a day in the glorious sunshine, we visited more than 130 sites to...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Gemma Kennedy</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="London Occupiers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="battersea" label="Battersea" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="londonoffices" label="london offices" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="sitevisit" label="site visit" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="sw11" label="sw11" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="sw8" label="sw8" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="sw9" label="sw9" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/">
        <![CDATA[<font size="2">
<p>Yesterday, we visited the next stop on our magical mystery tour of London's outer postcodes; SW8, SW9 and SW11. As hard as it was to spend a day in the glorious sunshine, we visited more than 130 sites to capture the most current data. </p>
<p>I'll blog again when the area is up and running on EGi but for now, here are some pictures of our visit:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/Battesea%20Reach.jpg"></a></p>
<p></font><img class="mt-image-left" style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 20px 20px 0px" height="336" alt="Battersea Studios 2.jpg" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/Battersea%20Studios%202.jpg" width="448" />&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/Mandeville%20Courtyard%20142%20Battersea%20Park%20Road.jpg"></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/Falcon%20Wharf.jpg"></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/Site%20Visit%20SW8%20054.jpg"></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">Battersea Studios</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><img class="mt-image-none" height="336" alt="Battesea Reach.jpg" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/Battesea%20Reach.jpg" width="448" /></p>
<p>Battersea Reach</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><img class="mt-image-none" height="336" alt="falcon wharf.jpg" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/falcon%20wharf.jpg" width="448" /></p>
<p>&nbsp;Falcon Wharf</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><img class="mt-image-none" height="336" alt="Mandeville Courtyard 142 Battersea Park Road.jpg" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/Mandeville%20Courtyard%20142%20Battersea%20Park%20Road.jpg" width="448" /></p>
<p>&nbsp;Mandeville Courtyard</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><img class="mt-image-none" height="336" alt="Site Visit SW8 054.jpg" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/Site%20Visit%20SW8%20054.jpg" width="448" /></p>
<p>St George's Wharf</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><img class="mt-image-none" height="448" alt="MI6 HQ 055.jpg" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/MI6%20HQ%20055.jpg" width="336" /></p>
<p>MI6 HQ. Unfortunatley, access was denied at this building. We're good, but we're not that good!&nbsp; </p><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/MI6%20HQ%20055.jpg"></a>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Three monsters destroy City view </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/2010/05/three-monsters-destroy-city-vi.html" />
    <id>tag:www.estatesgazette.com,2010:/blogs/london-office-database//78.158825</id>

    <published>2010-05-27T10:31:19Z</published>
    <updated>2010-05-27T10:35:09Z</updated>

    <summary>During the course of last weekend&apos;s heatwave I visited Primrose Hill, along with half of London, to check out the fabulous City views. However, I was sorely disappointed when half the view of the City was missing due to three...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jennifer Islip</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Development" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="London Buildings" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/">
        <![CDATA[<p>During the course of last weekend's heatwave I visited Primrose Hill, along with half of London, to check out the fabulous City views. However, I was sorely disappointed when half the view of the City was missing due to three monstrous buildings with red, yellow and blue tops.. classy. I assume these buildings&nbsp;are residential but&nbsp;how they got past planning I don't know, anyone know what they are..... </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><img class="mt-image-none" height="176" alt="DSC01299.JPG" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-office-database/DSC01299.JPG" width="448" /></p>
<p>On a positive note, there were plenty of cranes up in the skies, signalling the race back to the construction site as demand returns.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>
