<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>The Pint of Milk Test</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:www.estatesgazette.com,2009-08-28:/blogs/london-residential-research//77</id>
    <updated>2010-03-19T16:22:56Z</updated>
    
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Enterprise 4.32-en</generator>

<entry>
    <title>NEO</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/2010/03/neo.html" />
    <id>tag:www.estatesgazette.com,2010:/blogs/london-residential-research//77.124781</id>

    <published>2010-03-19T16:11:35Z</published>
    <updated>2010-03-19T16:22:56Z</updated>

    <summary>You can usually tell quite a bit about a development from the marketing suite. This is the one for NEO Bankside, on the site of the old Dave Musset building, slap bang opposite the Tate Modern and 5 minutes walk...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Nigel</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <category term="bankside" label="Bankside" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="neo" label="NEO" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="tatemodern" label="Tate Modern" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/">
        <![CDATA[<p>You can usually tell quite a bit about a development from the marketing suite. This is the one for <a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/2009/04/project-bankside.html">NEO Bankside</a>, on the site of the old <a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/2008/07/dave.html">Dave Musset</a> building, slap bang opposite the Tate Modern and 5 minutes walk to the <a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/2009/06/bear-gardens.html">Globe</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="400" alt="NEO Bankside.JPG" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/NEO%20Bankside.JPG" width="533" /></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>All go at the Elephant</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/2010/03/elephant.html" />
    <id>tag:www.estatesgazette.com,2010:/blogs/london-residential-research//77.124742</id>

    <published>2010-03-19T11:42:06Z</published>
    <updated>2010-03-19T15:41:32Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[Quite a few stories circulatting at the moment regarding the Elephant and Castle, all positive too, which is something that hasn't been said too often in the past. Firstly an article in todays&nbsp;Times titled 'The High Life in Elephant &amp;...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Paul Wellman</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <category term="brookfield" label="Brookfield" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="elephantandcastle" label="Elephant and Castle" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="heygateestate" label="Heygate Estate" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="lendlease" label="Lend Lease" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="southwark" label="Southwark" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="stmodwen" label="St Modwen" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="stata" label="Stata" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Quite a few stories circulatting at the moment regarding the Elephant and Castle, all positive too, which is something that hasn't been said too often in the past. </p>
<p>Firstly an article in todays&nbsp;Times titled <a href="http://property.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/property/new_homes/article7067417.ece">'The High Life in Elephant &amp; Castle'</a>. In it it&nbsp;asks whether the newly built <a href="http://www.stratalondon.com/">Strata</a> will be a symbol of hope and says it could be the making of one of the capital's most deprived areas.</p>
<p>The Strata building which some apparently now are calling 'The Razor', really? do we have to? is now very nearly complete. The Guardian has an&nbsp;interesting story <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/mar/14/razor-tower-wind-turbines">(link)</a> on the buildings green credentials, which states that the wind turbines blades&nbsp;are due on site next week and will be winched into place in early April. When that does happen it will become the world's first&nbsp;building with wind turbines built into it's fabric, the fact that they will provide just 8% of the buildings electricty&nbsp;needs, is a little bit less fantastic. They also have some really good&nbsp;photos of the scheme <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/gallery/2010/mar/15/strata-tower-razor?picture=360427571">here</a>, some of them shown below.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/elephant%201.JPG"><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="368" alt="elephant 1.JPG" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/assets_c/2010/03/elephant%201-thumb-550x368-67834.jpg" width="550" /></a>In other news, the redevelopment of the tatty and outdated (still a huge&nbsp;understatement) shopping centre could take place earlier than planned. Southwark, St Modwen and Lend Lease are currently discussing how to bring&nbsp;it forward after it got pushed back to phase 6 in last years revised regeneration programme. The operative word here though is 'could', these three have been talking for years... (<a href="http://www.london-se1.co.uk/news/view/4426">the story in full</a>)</p>
<p>I've saved the best till last however, with the news that the Heygate Estate is finally going under the wrecking ball, with demolition works recently getting underway. According to <a href="http://www.24dash.com/news/Housing/2010-03-15-Heygate-Estate-demolition-gets-physical">24dash.com</a>&nbsp;the Rodney Road and Wingrave blocks are now vacant and will form phase one of the demolition. They say the removal and salvage of flat contents, vermin baiting and a hygiene sweep is already&nbsp;in progress. Banners have also&nbsp;been erected on empty blocks to advise the very last staggling residents that demolition is now underway.</p>
<p>I'll leave you with this photo taken from the 19th&nbsp;floor of&nbsp;Strata, looking out onto the Heygate Estate. The average price for residential units is £500,000 with just a few out of the 310 private units still left to go. One of those though is the the top floor penthouse still on the market for £2,500,000. I think the price tag merits a better view than this, although hopefully the view won't hang around for too&nbsp;long now.</p>
<p><br />&nbsp;</p>
<p><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="366" alt="Thumbnail image for starta - heygate view.jpg" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/assets_c/2010/03/starta%20-%20heygate%20view-thumb-550x366-67839.jpg" width="550" /></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Temporarily Entertaining</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/2010/03/musical-chairs.html" />
    <id>tag:www.estatesgazette.com,2010:/blogs/london-residential-research//77.124737</id>

    <published>2010-03-19T11:01:32Z</published>
    <updated>2010-03-19T12:07:46Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[Last month I blogged about LandSec's Park House development on Oxford Street. Works are yet to start, but that does not&nbsp;mean that there's nothing happening on site, far from it. Go there today and you'll see this: &nbsp; &nbsp; It's...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Nigel</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <category term="chelseabarraks" label="Chelsea Barraks" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="landsec" label="Land Sec" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="parkhouse" label="Park House" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="pottersfields" label="Potters Fields" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Last month I blogged about <a href="http://www.landsec.co.uk/index.asp?PageID=1"><font color="#216ec2">LandSec's</font></a> <a href="http://www.landsec.co.uk/ls03.asp?PageID=409"><font color="#216ec2">Park House</font></a> development on Oxford Street. Works are yet to start, but that does not&nbsp;mean that there's nothing happening on site, far from it.</p>
<p>Go there today and you'll see this:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="317" alt="Dinasaurs Unleashed.jpg" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/Dinasaurs%20Unleashed.jpg" width="322" /></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>It's all part of the <a href="http://www.timeout.com/london/kids/event/170468/dinosaurs-unleashed"><font color="#800080" size="2">Dinosaurs Unleashed Exhibition</font></a>, a temporary attraction&nbsp;with&nbsp;about a month still left to run. The key word here is temporary.</p>
<p>Back in the heady pre-Lehman days, it was all so easy; buy land - build on land - sell the stuff that you built - make profit - repeat process.&nbsp;Things are a bit more complicated now.</p>
<p>When do you build? Will the market have improved by the time&nbsp;your development's&nbsp;finished? Will there be anyone out there&nbsp;with the money to buy? It's all a question of timing, and in this game of musical chairs,&nbsp;you stand to loose a lot more than your seat if you get it wrong. But just because you haven't started building on a site doesn't mean you can't still make a profit from it, on the contrary.</p>
<p>If you've got a large, cleared open space in a decent location you could do a lot worse than appliying for&nbsp;<font size="2">the temporary use of the site&nbsp;for "large entertainment uses" as Land Sec did. And they're not the only ones. This summer <a href="http://www.propertyweek.com/story.asp?storycode=3157689">Chelsea Barraks</a> will become an antiques fair, although how successfull the new water feature&nbsp;at&nbsp;Potters Field (below)&nbsp;will be is anyone's guess.</font></p>
<p><font size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="400" alt="Potters Field Baths.JPG" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/Potters%20Field%20Baths.JPG" width="533" /></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Power to the pedestrians</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/2010/03/the-idea-of-empowerment-of.html" />
    <id>tag:www.estatesgazette.com,2010:/blogs/london-residential-research//77.124393</id>

    <published>2010-03-16T15:28:47Z</published>
    <updated>2010-03-16T15:54:56Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[The&nbsp;concept of empowerment of pedestrians over the use of the car is an idea which planners and urban designers&nbsp;have pursued for quite a while now but has recently come to the fore (especially in central London) and is highlighted in...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Paul Wellman</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The&nbsp;concept of empowerment of pedestrians over the use of the car is an idea which planners and urban designers&nbsp;have pursued for quite a while now but has recently come to the fore (especially in central London) and is highlighted in these 3 stories below. Firstly, the new Oxford Circus Crossing. Recent research by consultants Atkins over the Christmas shopping period showed that the new crossing had improved safety 20% and made pedestrians feel less stressed. They also claimed it has generated £6.5m in benefits from pedestrian and vehicle journey time savings, recouping its costs inside a year.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/oxford%20circus.jpg"><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="300" alt="oxford circus.jpg" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/assets_c/2010/03/oxford%20circus-thumb-500x300-67425.jpg" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>Piccadilly Circus is also set for a transformation as part of a £14m revamp, which will rid the busy central London junction of guard railings. Westminster Council recently approved&nbsp;plans that will remove more than 1km of railings, build a&nbsp;central island along Piccadilly and Pall Mall and reintroduce&nbsp;two-way traffic. Work is expected to&nbsp;begin in November and take 12 months to complete.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/Piccadilly%20Circus%20revamp.jpg"><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="321" alt="Piccadilly Circus revamp.jpg" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/assets_c/2010/03/Piccadilly%20Circus%20revamp-thumb-500x321-67428.jpg" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>Work has also recently begun (yesterday) on removing the southern roundabout of Elephant and Castle, 4 years after it was first promised. In its place will be a three-way junction with surface-level pedestrain crossings, with the horrible underground subways filled in. Work is expected to be finished early next year and will form the heart of the&nbsp;Elephant and Castle regeneration area, fronting the nearing completion Strata.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/elephant%20southern%20roundabout.jpg"><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="460" alt="elephant southern roundabout.jpg" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/assets_c/2010/03/elephant%20southern%20roundabout-thumb-500x460-67435.jpg" width="500" /></a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Boris&apos;s Island Airport &apos;pie in the sky&apos;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/2010/03/boriss-island-airport-pie-in-t.html" />
    <id>tag:www.estatesgazette.com,2010:/blogs/london-residential-research//77.124277</id>

    <published>2010-03-15T16:48:31Z</published>
    <updated>2010-03-16T15:23:25Z</updated>

    <summary>Medway Council have criticised Boris Johnson&apos;s ideas for an airport to be situated in the Thames Estuary, calling them &apos;pie in the sky&apos;! Johnson has set up a Thames Estuary steering group to look into the £40 billion scheme, but it...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Janine Nieto</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <category term="borisjohnson" label="Boris Johnson" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="medwaycouncil" label="Medway Council" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="thamesestuary" label="Thames Estuary" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.medway.gov.uk/news/newsmain/newspage?item=104979">Medway Council</a> have criticised Boris Johnson's ideas for an airport to be situated in the Thames Estuary, calling them 'pie in the sky'!</p>
<p><img class="mt-image-none" height="216" alt="thames airport.jpg" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/thames%20airport.jpg" width="415" /></p>
<p>Johnson has set up a <a href="http://www.thamesestuaryairport.com/">Thames Estuary steering group </a>to look into the £40 billion scheme, but it has been dismissed as unworkable by environmentalists not least that by situating an airport in the Thames would mean that aircraft would be 12 times more likely to suffer a birdstrike than other airports that are situated inland.&nbsp;Medway Council joined with <a href="http://www.kent.gov.uk/">Kent County Council</a> and the <a href="http://www.rspb.org.uk/">RSPB </a>last year to launch a campaign against the Thames Estuary airport plan.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Further environmental concerns have risen in the report from the fact that the proposed airport would be situated to close to the major liquid natural gas port at Thamesport and the probababilty of the need of a new railway station has been over-looked.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>London Buildings With Hidden Secrets</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/2010/03/london-buildings-with-many-sec.html" />
    <id>tag:www.estatesgazette.com,2010:/blogs/london-residential-research//77.124263</id>

    <published>2010-03-15T15:15:47Z</published>
    <updated>2010-03-17T15:42:02Z</updated>

    <summary>Numerous buildings across London have come to light for being former locations where both foreign and domestic spies have hung out. The information has been published in a new book, &apos;The Insider&apos;s Guide to 150 Spy Sites in London&apos; written...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Janine Nieto</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Numerous buildings across London have <a href="http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23812350-declassified-secret-london-haunts-of-the-real-life-spooks.do">come to light </a>for being former locations where both foreign and domestic spies have hung out. The information has been published in a new book, 'The Insider's Guide to 150 Spy Sites in London' written by Mark Birdsall and Deborah Plisko.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Although Londoner's are familiar with the home of MI5 on Millbank and MI6 at Vauxhall Cross, other more inconspicuos buildings have been uncovered. Some of which can be linked to the Sixties Cambridge spy ring as well as those involved in the more recent death by polonium poisioning of former Russian agent Alexander Litvinenko who is believed to have been killed by disgruntled ex-KGB members. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Other buildings include the Cafe Daquise in South Kensington which held secret meetings between Christine Keeler the call girl at the centre of the Profumo scandal and Eugene Ivanor, a Soviet&nbsp;embassy civil servant.</p>
<p><img class="mt-image-left" style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 20px 20px 0px" height="275" alt="SECRET LONDON.jpg" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/SECRET%20LONDON.jpg" width="415" />The book also uncovers details of locations of supposed dead letter drops, front companies, safe houses, garages and underground sites all which have been associated with the work of the intelligence services. </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>CABE flexes muscle and Tesco&apos;s back down</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/2010/03/cabe-flexes-muscle-and-tescos.html" />
    <id>tag:www.estatesgazette.com,2010:/blogs/london-residential-research//77.123990</id>

    <published>2010-03-11T14:12:47Z</published>
    <updated>2010-03-11T17:03:38Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[Influential architectural review panel CABE have savaged Tesco's plan for their major regeneration development in Bromley-by-Bow.&nbsp;They&nbsp;raised concerns that the project lacks a clear masterplan and&nbsp;is "incoherent" in its layout, is disjointed and divides the scheme into distinct quarters that conflict...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Paul Wellman</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <category term="bromleybybow" label="Bromley-by-Bow" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="cabe" label="CABE" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="colladocollins" label="Collado Collins" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="tesco" label="Tesco" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="towerhamlets" label="Tower Hamlets" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/Tesco%27s%20-%20bromly-by-bow.jpg"></a>Influential architectural review panel <a href="http://www.cabe.org.uk/">CABE</a> have savaged <a href="http://www.tesco.com/talkingtesco/stores/">Tesco's</a> plan for their major regeneration development in Bromley-by-Bow.&nbsp;They&nbsp;raised concerns that the project lacks a clear masterplan and&nbsp;is "incoherent" in its layout, is disjointed and divides the scheme into distinct quarters that conflict with one another. They also pointed out that most future residents will have a view either over grid-locked traffic or the roof of a huge new Tesco store. There wasn't a lot CABE did like on the scheme which was masterplanned by <a href="http://www.colladocollins.com/projects.html">Callado Collins</a>. In summing up the scheme they also stated that they were disappointed that CABE were not consulted at an earlier stage when they could have contributed more constructively to the design development process.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="260" alt="Thumbnail image for Tesco's - bromly-by-bow.jpg" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/assets_c/2010/03/Tesco's%20-%20bromly-by-bow-thumb-500x260-66799.jpg" width="500" />The government's advisor on architecture, urban design and public space published their review of this scheme on the 3rd of March, less than a week later Tesco's have sent&nbsp;their architects back&nbsp;to the drawing board. The supermarket giant said it had taken the criticism on board and, following this and further community consultation, was revising the scheme. A spokesman said: "We want the scheme to deliver the best result for the area and are grateful for the feedback we have received."</p>
<p>The scheme proposes&nbsp;a new district centre including a replacement Tesco store of nearly 12,000sqm, other retail&nbsp;and community uses, a hotel, a&nbsp;primary school and&nbsp;403 residential units as well as a new public riverside&nbsp;park. CABE's review of the scheme can be found <a href="http://www.cabe.org.uk/design-review/tesco-bromley-by-bow">here</a>.</p>
<p>With this recent CABE review and subsequent quick response from Tesco's its good to see that the Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment is doing exactly what it set out to achieve when it started back in 1999; improve design.&nbsp;You just wonder&nbsp;why if&nbsp;Tesco's&nbsp;give CABE's view in such high remark, why didn't they&nbsp;consult with them first? They may well do next time.&nbsp;</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Brick Lane</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/2010/03/brick-lane.html" />
    <id>tag:www.estatesgazette.com,2010:/blogs/london-residential-research//77.123315</id>

    <published>2010-03-04T13:41:15Z</published>
    <updated>2010-03-09T09:36:23Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[This next blog isn't strictly a residential one&nbsp;but it's interesting none the less, well I think so anyway. As a regular visitor to the Brick Lane area for site visit purposes, what I call 'the proper East End' and Jack...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Paul Wellman</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <category term="bricklane" label="Brick Lane" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="bricklanemosque" label="Brick Lane Mosque" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="minaret" label="Minaret" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="spitalfields" label="Spitalfields" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="towerhamlets" label="Tower Hamlets" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/">
        <![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><font color="#000000"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">This next blog isn't strictly a residential one&nbsp;but it's interesting none the less, well I think so anyway. As a regular visitor to the Brick Lane area for site visit purposes, what I call 'the proper East End' and Jack the Ripper's old stomping ground, I came across this; the new Minaret outside the Brick Lane </span><span lang="EN" style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-ansi-language: EN; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold">Mosque. The controversial structure actually gained consent back in January 2006 but has only now just been built. The idea gained prominence in the media around the mayoral election time last year as Ken Livingstone promised to help raise funds for it&nbsp;to gain&nbsp;the Muslim vote. <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span lang="EN" style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-ansi-language: EN; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold"><o:p><font color="#000000"></font></o:p></span>&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span lang="EN" style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-ansi-language: EN; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold"></span><span lang="EN" style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-ansi-language: EN; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold"><o:p></o:p></span>&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span lang="EN" style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-ansi-language: EN; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold"><o:p><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/Copy%20of%20minaret%201.JPG"></a><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/Copy%20of%20minaret%201.JPG"></a></o:p></span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><font color="#000000"><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/Copy%20of%20minaret%201.JPG"><img class="mt-image-left" style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 20px 20px 0px" height="433" alt="Copy of minaret 1.JPG" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/assets_c/2010/03/Copy%20of%20minaret%201-thumb-325x433-65880.jpg" width="325" /></a>Other locals are not so fond of it however. Here are the reasons: The Brick Lane mosque is grade 2 listed and in a conservation area, the new Minaret as seen in the picture is quite large and obtrusive. Also intriguingly the mosque today as it stands lies comparable to when it was&nbsp;first built as a&nbsp;<st1:place w:st="on"><st1:PlaceName w:st="on">French</st1:PlaceName> <st1:PlaceName w:st="on">Protestant</st1:PlaceName> <st1:PlaceType w:st="on">Church</st1:PlaceType></st1:place> in 1743. After this it was turned into a Methodist Chapel in 1819 and then again to a Jewish Synagogue in 1898. Now obviously it serves its purpose as a Mosque.<o:p></o:p></font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><o:p><font color="#000000">&nbsp;</font></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><font color="#000000">This building then </font></span><span lang="EN" style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #333333; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-ansi-language: EN">has often been remarked as representing the history of successive communities of immigrants into London; from this point of view it may be called one of the most remarkable and evocative buildings in the area and one of London's architectural and historic treasures. As new influxes of people have come in to the area and taken over the building for their own religious purpose, they have given the building very slight changes. Now the argument persists that "what&nbsp;happens when&nbsp;another religion moves in to and dominates the local landscape?" It would be a lot harder to knock down a minaret instead of applying a lick of paint which is what has happened in the past. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span lang="EN" style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #333333; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-ansi-language: EN"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span lang="EN" style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #333333; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-ansi-language: EN">Continuing the theme, Tower Hamlets&nbsp;also look set to approve two structures which represent veil head scarves worn by Muslim women at the entrances to <st1:Street w:st="on"><st1:address w:st="on">Brick Lane</st1:address></st1:Street>, at the north and to&nbsp;the south. This has again proved hugely unpopular and is being paid for by S106 money from the Spitalfields refurbishment and the <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:PlaceName w:st="on">Broadgate</st1:PlaceName> <st1:PlaceType w:st="on">Tower</st1:PlaceType></st1:place>. Local protesters including artist&nbsp;Tracey Emin </span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #2a2a2a; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">called the design "bulky, ungainly and unnecessary" and risked</span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-ansi-language: EN"><font color="#000000"> </font><span lang="EN"><font color="#000000">inflaming racial tension.</font><span style="COLOR: #333333"> The 'hijab gates' as they will be called will cost nearly £2m and has received 158 objections, but planners recommended granting permission at committee (tonight 04/03/2010). Below is the Brick Lane entrance on Bethnal Green Road with the proposed structure.</span></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-ansi-language: EN"><span lang="EN"><span style="COLOR: #333333"></span></span></span>&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-ansi-language: EN"><span lang="EN"><span style="COLOR: #333333"><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/Brick%20Lane%20arches.jpg"></a><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/Brick%20Lane%20arches.jpg"><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="296" alt="Brick Lane arches.jpg" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/assets_c/2010/03/Brick%20Lane%20arches-thumb-500x296-65883.jpg" width="500" /></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span lang="EN" style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #333333; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-ansi-language: EN">Going back to the Mosque, can you think of a building that better&nbsp;shows the influx of different social and religious groups through time to a particular place like the Brick Lane Mosque does? I can't.<o:p></o:p></span></p></span></span></span>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Battersea Pumping Station</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/2010/03/battersea-pumping-station.html" />
    <id>tag:www.estatesgazette.com,2010:/blogs/london-residential-research//77.123239</id>

    <published>2010-03-03T16:56:31Z</published>
    <updated>2010-03-03T17:04:51Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[After the long awaited submission of a planning application for Battersea Power Station in October 2009,&nbsp;as well&nbsp;as&nbsp;the support of the designs&nbsp;by the government, it looked as though progress was being made in rejuvenating the landmark site. However, it has emerged...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Clare Pearce</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <category term="batterseapowerstation" label="Battersea Power Station" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="pumpingstation" label="Pumping station" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="treasuryholdings" label="Treasury Holdings" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="victoriansociety" label="Victorian Society" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/">
        <![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><font color="#000000">After the long awaited submission of a planning application for <a href="http://www.battersea-powerstation.com/#/home">Battersea Power Station</a> in October 2009,&nbsp;as well&nbsp;as&nbsp;the support of the designs&nbsp;by the government, it looked as though progress was being made in rejuvenating the landmark site. However, it has emerged today that a little-known Victorian pumping station, pictured below, could further delay the development of the site.<o:p></o:p></font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><o:p><font color="#000000">&nbsp;</font></o:p></span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><o:p><font color="#000000">&nbsp;<img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="412" alt="battersea pumping station.JPG" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/battersea%20pumping%20station.JPG" width="660" /></font></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><font color="#000000"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><a href="http://www.victoriansociety.org.uk/">The Victorian Society</a>&nbsp;is opposing the plans for the power station as it would mean the demolition of the "historically important and rare" water pumping station. <a href="http://www.treasuryholdings.com/">Treasury Holdings</a> do not feel that they can make use of the pumping station, and believe that if it is not removed then it will damage the potential for </span><span lang="EN" style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-ansi-language: EN">recouping the cost of restoring the larger and more famous power station. </span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">However, previous planning permission to demolish the Grade II listed&nbsp;building expired in 2007 and nothing has been&nbsp;submitted since, so Treasury Holdings may have a&nbsp;long battle on their hands.</span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><font color="#000000"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"></span></font>&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><font color="#000000"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>London Skyline</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/2010/02/london-skyline.html" />
    <id>tag:www.estatesgazette.com,2010:/blogs/london-residential-research//77.122706</id>

    <published>2010-02-26T09:38:20Z</published>
    <updated>2010-02-26T10:08:34Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[Here's an entertaining interactive website from Hayes Davidson where you can build your very own London skyline.&nbsp;It has 3 views, past, present and future to all of which you can add a selection of actual and proposed buildings as well...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Nigel</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <category term="burjkhalifa" label="Burj Khalifa" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="eiffeltower" label="Eiffel Tower" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="hayesdavidson" label="Hayes Davidson" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="interactive" label="Interactive" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="london" label="London" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="skyline" label="Skyline" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Here's an entertaining interactive website from Hayes Davidson where you can build your very own <a href="http://www.hayesdavidson.com/skyline/">London skyline.</a>&nbsp;It has 3 views, past, present and future to all of which you can add a selection of actual and proposed buildings as well as ones from around the globe. So if you think you know the London skyline, go to the past view and start adding buildings. Once you're done click on the present or future tabs to see how well you did. Here's mine:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="400" alt="Hayes Davidson1.JPG" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/Hayes%20Davidson1.JPG" width="615" /></p>
<p>..not bad but the Doon Street development is way out. Once you get bored of that (how could you possibly) start adding buildings from around the world:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="400" alt="Hayes Davidson2.JPG" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/Hayes%20Davidson2.JPG" width="618" /></p>
<p>The Eiffel Tower and the Burj Khalifa, the oldest and newest in the selection sit well&nbsp;on the skyline, bit difficult to get through customs though.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Squabbling between Ministry of Sound and Oakmayne</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/2010/02/squabbling-between-ministry-of.html" />
    <id>tag:www.estatesgazette.com,2010:/blogs/london-residential-research//77.122377</id>

    <published>2010-02-23T15:52:55Z</published>
    <updated>2010-02-23T17:58:03Z</updated>

    <summary> The Ministry of Sound nightclub is objecting to the redevelopment by Oakmayne of Eileen House in Elephant and Castle. The scheme pictured below has already been revised twice to make it shorter after both London Mayor Boris Johnson and...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Paul Wellman</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <category term="eileenhouse" label="Eileen House" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="elephantandcastle" label="Elephant and Castle" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="ministryofsound" label="Ministry of Sound" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="oakmayne" label="Oakmayne" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="strata" label="Strata" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/">
        <![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; tab-stops: 27.0pt"><o:p><font face="Times New Roman" color="#000000" size="3"></font></o:p></p><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman"><span lang="EN" style="COLOR: #333333; mso-ansi-language: EN">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">The <a href="http://www.ministryofsound.com/club/"><font color="#800080">Ministry of Sound</font></a> nightclub is objecting to the redevelopment by <a href="http://www.oakmayneproperties.com/"><font color="#800080">Oakmayne</font></a> of <a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/talkingproperty/wikis/london/eileen-house.aspx"><font color="#800080">Eileen House</font></a> in Elephant and Castle. The scheme pictured below has already been revised twice </span><span lang="EN" style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #333333; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-ansi-language: EN">to make it shorter after both London Mayor <a href="http://www.london.gov.uk/who-runs-london/mayor/boris-johnson"><font color="#800080">Boris Johnson </font></a>and government quango English Heritage expressed concerns about its height. In March 2009, after already reducing the height of the scheme Boris&nbsp;Johnson said it would ruin views from <st1:place w:st="on">Hyde Park</st1:place> in&nbsp;the winter when the trees had shed their leaves.</span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><o:p></o:p></span></p></span></font></font>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; tab-stops: 27.0pt"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman"><span lang="EN" style="COLOR: #333333; mso-ansi-language: EN"></span></font></font>&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; tab-stops: 27.0pt"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman"><span lang="EN" style="COLOR: #333333; mso-ansi-language: EN"></span><span lang="EN" style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #333333; mso-ansi-language: EN"><o:p></o:p></span></font></font>&nbsp;<span lang="EN" style="COLOR: #333333; mso-ansi-language: EN"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1"><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/Eileen%20House.JPG"><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="359" alt="Eileen House.JPG" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/assets_c/2010/02/Eileen%20House-thumb-500x359-64703.jpg" width="500" /></a><span lang="EN" style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #333333; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-ansi-language: EN"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1">&nbsp;</span></span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #333333; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><o:p></o:p></span></p><u2:p></u2:p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; tab-stops: 27.0pt"><span lang="EN" style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #333333; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-ansi-language: EN">Now the Ministry of Sound nightclub which lies directly across the road from the site has got in on the act voicing their objections to Southwark Council. They are worried that with 1,000 new residents moving in next door, just 1 has to complain, which could lead to a challenge of their license. </span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #333333; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><o:p></o:p></span></p><u2:p></u2:p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; tab-stops: 27.0pt"><u2:p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">&nbsp;</span></u2:p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #333333; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; tab-stops: 27.0pt"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/ministry_of_sound_logo_2960.gif"></a><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/ministry_of_sound_logo_2960.gif"></a>Oakmayne have offered to soundproof the club and pay the £400,000 towards it. Ministry of Sound say they will have to close up for up to a year and aren't prepared to compromise.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; tab-stops: 27.0pt"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"></span>&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; tab-stops: 27.0pt"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">BBC 6 music even has a <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/6music/news/20100223_ministryofsound.shtml">petition</a> going to 'save it from the developers'. Ministry were there first way before the gentrifiers, 19 years it's been running with 300,000 people annually passing through its doors. With big London clubs closing in recent years like Turnmills and more recently The Astoria due to Crossrail London clubbers will hope another one is not wiped off the map.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; tab-stops: 27.0pt"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"></span>&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; tab-stops: 27.0pt"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/assets_c/2010/02/ministry_of_sound_logo_2960-thumb-150x151-64731.gif"><img class="mt-image-left" style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 20px 20px 0px" height="151" alt="Thumbnail image for ministry_of_sound_logo_2960.gif" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/assets_c/2010/02/ministry_of_sound_logo_2960-thumb-150x151-64731-thumb-150x151-64733.gif" width="150" /></a></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; tab-stops: 27.0pt"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"></span>&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; tab-stops: 27.0pt"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Let's hope the two parties can come to a compromise though, becasue Elephant and Castle <span lang="EN" style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-ansi-language: EN">desperately</span>&nbsp;needs the continued regeneration efforts&nbsp;that hopefully Strata will bring. £20m of S106 planning benefits is also at stake with £16m of that going towards affordable housing.</span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #333333; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; tab-stops: 27.0pt"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #333333; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; tab-stops: 27.0pt"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Click on this <a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/talkingproperty/wikis/london/eileen-house.aspx"><font color="#800080">link</font></a> to view the Eileen House wiki page on <a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/"><font color="#800080">estatesgazette.com</font></a></span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #333333; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/"><font color="#800080">&nbsp;</font></a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; tab-stops: 27.0pt 171.0pt"></span></font></font></span></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The Shoal</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/2010/02/the-shoal.html" />
    <id>tag:www.estatesgazette.com,2010:/blogs/london-residential-research//77.122216</id>

    <published>2010-02-22T10:37:13Z</published>
    <updated>2010-02-22T10:47:42Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[This is The Shoal, a Studio Egret&nbsp;sculpture that has just been granted planning permission from Newham council as an innovative way to brighten up the 2012 Olympic Games. The structure is 450m long and around 16m tall and will feature...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Clare Pearce</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <category term="2012" label="2012" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="newham" label="Newham" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="olympics" label="Olympics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="stratford" label="Stratford" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="stratfordcity" label="Stratford City" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="studioegret" label="Studio Egret" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="theshoal" label="The Shoal" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="westfield" label="Westfield" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/">
        <![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><font color="#000000">This is The Shoal, a <a href="http://www.egretwest.com/">Studio Egret</a>&nbsp;sculpture that has just been granted planning permission from <a href="http://www.newham.gov.uk/">Newham</a> council as an innovative way to brighten up the <a href="http://www.london2012.com/">2012 Olympic Games</a>. The structure is 450m long and around</font></span><span lang="EN" style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-ansi-language: EN"> 16m tall and will feature 180 polished titanium "leaves" which will sway gently in the breeze, running all the way around the <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:City w:st="on">Stratford</st1:City></st1:place> gyratory. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span lang="EN" style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-ansi-language: EN"></span>&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span lang="EN" style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-ansi-language: EN"></span><span lang="EN" style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-ansi-language: EN"><o:p><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="277" alt="The shoal.jpg" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/The%20shoal.jpg" width="468" /></o:p></span><span lang="EN" style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-ansi-language: EN">This all may sound lovely, but the project is going to cost £3 million and </span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><font color="#000000">the whole idea behind it is just to hide the "shabby" looking <st1:City w:st="on">Stratford</st1:City> shops from the 2012 Olympic visitors and future <st1:City w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on"><a href="http://uk.westfield.com/stratfordcity/">Westfield</a></st1:place></st1:City> shoppers.<o:p></o:p></font></span></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Big new application for Skylines</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/2010/02/big-new-application-for-skylin.html" />
    <id>tag:www.estatesgazette.com,2010:/blogs/london-residential-research//77.121308</id>

    <published>2010-02-12T12:40:33Z</published>
    <updated>2010-02-12T14:09:18Z</updated>

    <summary>A new application has been submitted for the Skylines site on the Isle of Dogs. Development over the past few years has typically been to the south and west of Canary Wharf but it now seems to be shifting a...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Paul Wellman</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <category term="canarywharf" label="Canary Wharf" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="e14" label="E14" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="farrells" label="Farrells" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="isleofdogs" label="Isle of Dogs" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="skylines" label="Skylines" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/">
        <![CDATA[<p>A new application has been submitted for the Skylines site on the Isle of Dogs. Development over the past few years has typically been to the south and west of Canary Wharf but it now seems to be shifting a bit to the south east. The Skylines site situated abutting both Limehouse and Marsh Wall will sit just to the south of <a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/2009/03/e143g20.html">Angel House</a>, (due back to Tower Hamlets committee soon with&nbsp;recommendation to grant after recently getting deferred). Designed by <a href="http://www.terryfarrell.co.uk/">Farrells</a> it will house 806 residential units in total, 635 of them private. This has been reduced slightly from the scoping opinion which was for 903 residential units, the tallest building being 52 storeys. The full application has also dropped to 50 storeys, after consultation with the council. It will still be taller than nearby Pan Peninsula however. The scheme will also&nbsp;house a 123 bedroom hotel, 2,020sqm of retail and 6,900sqm of office space.&nbsp;The developer is ZVB Skylines with <a href="http://www.rolfe-judd.co.uk/">Rolfe Judd</a> as agent.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/skylines.jpg"><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="507" alt="skylines.jpg" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/assets_c/2010/02/skylines-thumb-500x507-63248.jpg" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>Below are a couple of pictures I've taken from the design and access statement showing the Skylines site against other consented schemes on the Isle of Dogs and Canary Wharf.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/skylines%20and%20canary%20wharf.JPG"><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="315" alt="skylines and canary wharf.JPG" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/assets_c/2010/02/skylines%20and%20canary%20wharf-thumb-500x315-63250.jpg" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/skylines%20isle%20of%20dogs.JPG"><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="374" alt="skylines isle of dogs.JPG" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/assets_c/2010/02/skylines%20isle%20of%20dogs-thumb-500x374-63252.jpg" width="500" /></a></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The Grand Deptford Canal</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/2010/02/the-grand-deptford-canal.html" />
    <id>tag:www.estatesgazette.com,2010:/blogs/london-residential-research//77.121284</id>

    <published>2010-02-12T10:59:18Z</published>
    <updated>2010-02-12T11:47:43Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[The news this week that City &amp; Provencial Properties has lodged&nbsp;an application&nbsp;for a 1million sq ft waterside&nbsp;mixed-use redevelopment in Deptford&nbsp;came as a surprise, as&nbsp;almost all of&nbsp;Deptford's limited riverside space is already taken up by schemes in the pipeline or under...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Clare Pearce</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <category term="canal" label="Canal" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="cityprovencial" label="City &amp; Provencial" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="deptford" label="Deptford" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="hawkinsbrown" label="Hawkins Brown" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/">
        <![CDATA[<p align="left">The news this week that <a href="http://www.cpp-plc.co.uk/">City &amp; Provencial Properties</a> has lodged&nbsp;an application&nbsp;for a 1million sq ft waterside&nbsp;mixed-use redevelopment in Deptford&nbsp;came as a surprise, as&nbsp;almost all of&nbsp;Deptford's limited riverside space is already taken up by schemes in the pipeline or under construction, such as <a href="http://www.convoyswharf.com/">Convoy's Wharf</a> and <a href="http://www.thecreeksidevillage.co.uk/">Greenwich Creekside</a>.</p>
<p>Further research led me to discover that this new proposal, designed by <a href="http://www.hawkinsbrown.co.uk/home.php">Hawkins Brown</a>, will not neighbour any existing waterway, but will be creating its own by going back to its roots.&nbsp;Back in the&nbsp;19th and early&nbsp;20th Centuries the <a href="http://www.londoncanals.co.uk/grsurrey/gsc01.html">Grand Surrey Canal</a> flowed from Surrey Quays all the way down to Camberwell, running straight through&nbsp;the middle of the site in question in Deptford. The canal was the first to have 'canal police' to keep order along the waterways, but after concerns about the number of children falling in it&nbsp;was eventually drained in the 1960s and 70s.</p>
<p>The new plans propose to reinstate the old canal through the new residential development, acting as a 'heart' for the development and a 'sustainable urban drainage system'. However the new waterway will only&nbsp;pass through the extent&nbsp;of the site owned by City &amp; Provencial and not the surrounding areas, meaning it may become more of a&nbsp;pond rather than a flowing waterway. The site in question currently looks like this:</p>
<p><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; WIDTH: 558px; HEIGHT: 382px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="400" alt="The wharves1.JPG" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/The%20wharves1.JPG" width="576" /></p>
<p>The&nbsp;new&nbsp;plans hope to rejuvenate&nbsp;the site&nbsp;and&nbsp;the&nbsp;developers visualise&nbsp;something&nbsp;along the lines of this for the future residents:</p>
<p><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="400" alt="The Wharves.JPG" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/The%20Wharves.JPG" width="569" />It looks like the canal police will be back though, this time disguised as giant rubber ducks.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Olympic views</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/2010/02/olympic-views.html" />
    <id>tag:www.estatesgazette.com,2010:/blogs/london-residential-research//77.121199</id>

    <published>2010-02-11T13:46:57Z</published>
    <updated>2010-02-11T15:56:08Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[Continuing on the theme of the Olympic Park and the views of it, I was thinking which development could claim to have the best?&nbsp;&nbsp; If like me you intend on being an armchair supporter, for the Olympics in two summers...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Paul Wellman</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <category term="e15" label="E15" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="e3" label="E3" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="hackney" label="Hackney" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="newham" label="Newham" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="olympics" label="Olympics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="telfordhomes" label="Telford Homes" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/assets_c/2010/02/riverside%20works-thumb-220x139-63121-thumb-280x176-63122-thumb-290x182-63124-thumb-270x169-63125-thumb-270x169-63128.jpg"></a>Continuing on the theme of the Olympic Park and the views of it, I was thinking which development could claim to have the best?&nbsp;<span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><o:p><font color="#000000">&nbsp;</font></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><font color="#000000">If like me you intend on being an armchair supporter, for the Olympics in two summers time, then the best place to be will of course be in your own living room. <o:p></o:p></font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; TEXT-INDENT: 36pt"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><o:p><font color="#000000">&nbsp;</font></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><font color="#000000">But if you would like to actually saviour the build up and atmosphere to the whole event at first hand with the feeling of actually being there what better way to do this then by watching from your very own window just a stones throw away. <o:p></o:p></font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><o:p><font color="#000000">&nbsp;</font></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><font color="#000000">If so, then probably the best place to do this will be from <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:PlaceName w:st="on">Fish</st1:PlaceName> <st1:PlaceType w:st="on">Island</st1:PlaceType></st1:place> in E3, like the post below would suggest. However, <a href="http://www.telfordhomes.plc.uk/">Telford Homes</a> may well have a claim to this statement as their Icona development on <st1:Street w:st="on"><st1:address w:st="on">Warton Road (below, left) </st1:address></st1:Street>in E15 also has great views as well as a higher panoramic elevation<a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/riverside%20works.jpg"></a>, but is set slightly further back from the stadium, and will have views from a different angle.</font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><font color="#000000"></font></span>&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><font color="#000000"></font></span>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/assets_c/2010/02/riverside%20works-thumb-220x139-63121-thumb-280x176-63122-thumb-290x182-63124-thumb-270x169-63125-thumb-270x169-63128.jpg"></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><font color="#000000"><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/riverside%20works.jpg"></a></font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><font color="#000000"><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/icona.jpg"></a><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/icona.jpg"></a></font></span></p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><font color="#000000"></font></span><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/riverside%20works.jpg"></a><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/assets_c/2010/02/riverside%20works-thumb-220x139-63121.jpg"></a>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/assets_c/2010/02/riverside%20works-thumb-220x139-63121-thumb-280x176-63122.jpg"></a><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><font color="#000000"></font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><font color="#000000"></font></span><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="181" alt="riverside &amp; icona.JPG" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/riverside%20%26%20icona.JPG" width="502" /><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><font color="#000000"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><font color="#000000">However, <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:PlaceName w:st="on">Fish</st1:PlaceName> <st1:PlaceType w:st="on">Island</st1:PlaceType></st1:place> will sit just across the River Lee Navigation which is literally a stones throw. It consists of a small selection of developments, already built, running the length of the Olympic park. The newest of these to complete was Riverside Works at 419 Wick Lane (above right).</font></span></font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><font color="#000000"></font></span>&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><font color="#000000">Earlier this week an e-mail popped into the LRR inbox advertising over 100 apartments for sale at this development. It&nbsp;was reportedly sold to a bulk investor back in 2008 but now appeares to be coming back to the market, probably just at the right time.<o:p></o:p></font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><font color="#000000"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;</span><o:p></o:p></font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><font color="#000000">According to the company dealing with the sales, the flats were historically priced at £326,000 but they claim to be able to offer them for £250,000. </font></span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><font color="#000000">The flats were built and ready for occupation from late 2008.<o:p></o:p></font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><o:p><font color="#000000">&nbsp;</font></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">Here is another aerial shot of the Olympic site, this one showing both of the above mentioned schemes.&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/aerial%20shot%20olympic%20site.jpg"></a></p>
<p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><font color="#000000"></font></span><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/aerial%20shot%20olympic%20site%20done%201.JPG"></a><a href="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/aerial%20shot%20olympic%20site%20fin.JPG"><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="412" alt="aerial shot olympic site fin.JPG" src="http://www.estatesgazette.com/blogs/london-residential-research/assets_c/2010/02/aerial%20shot%20olympic%20site%20fin-thumb-550x412-63141.jpg" width="550" /></a><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><font color="#000000">What development do you think will have the best views of the Olympics? Any suggestions? I'm sure there will be a few more too that will&nbsp;come to the fore in the next decade.</font></span></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>
