Recently in Developers Category

Guest Post: RECon 2013 - Day Three

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for J De Mello.JPG

As RECon 2013 draws to a close in the Las Vegas heat, CBRE head of consultancy Jonathan De Mello gives us his final recollections on an eventful few days.


"Tuesday at RECON - what a day!! The conference area was extremely busy as Tuesday was essentially the last day before everyone heads back home on the Wednesday. I was even busier than Monday with a host of meetings both planned and impromptu - really frantic but highly productive networking with lots of great new contacts and some interesting new brands that are keen on entering the UK and wider European market.

Now Americans aren't exactly known for being environmentally friendly, with BIG Oil, BIG cars and the ability to super-size pretty much anything, but the key theme I picked up from RECON this year - from a number of different US retailers - was their desire to build retail 'ecosystems.' 

This generally but not exclusively applies to retailers that also have wholesale and concession 'doors' in addition to free-standing stores and an omni-channel platform, but essentially relates to a desire to make money from a market overall through 'balancing' the ecosystem of all possible outlets, in addition to building brand equity. 

In the digital age this approach is becoming increasingly relevant, as retailers compete to trade in the best locations with high footfall in order to build up the brand which in turn fuels growth for their online business - which generally yields stronger profit margins for them. The ecosystem concept extends this further to incorporate wholesale and concession retail too, which again can in certain markets outperform free-standing stores from a profit margin perspective. 

Channel choice is therefore key, but free-standing stores are essential to this in terms of building up brand equity to drive sales through the other channels, as well as providing an outlet for click and collect services, which generate the highest margin of all given the delivery costs associated with pure online retail. Given the continued importance of free-standing stores - which in themselves will not typically generate stellar margins in very high footfall areas given these locations often have very high rents to match, as an industry I have often thought we should move towards trying to measure the positive impact of a free-standing store on brand equity. 

One way that this could be done is through applying metrics PR firms typically use - such as 'advertising equivalent' to footfall numbers going past a store. This would better aid retailers - and landlords - to understand and quantify the true benefit of having a store beyond just turnover and profit.

Wasn't planning on writing an essay for this blog but it has sort of turned into one - so moving on - it is impossible to write a blog on Vegas and not talk about the evening networking that goes on outside the convention centre. Tuesday night was particularly fruitful for me from that perspective with the NY Developers pool party at the Bellagio, a great dinner at the Mandarin Oriental with some current and new clients, and finally 1 Oak club at the Mirage, where a number of brokers were to be found engaging in a final bout of networking over drinks to wrap up their ICSC in style. It was a fitting end to a great trip to Vegas, and I for one will definitely be back for more next year!"

Guest Post: RECon 2013 - Day Two.

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Thumbnail image for J De Mello.JPG

CBRE's head of retail consultancy, Jonathan De Mello, takes us through the events of an exciting second day at the global shopping centre market conference in Las Vegas.

"It was a real mission to get out of bed at 5am on Monday morning, following the 10-hour flight the day before and consequent heavy jet lag. However, I am glad I did given the hundreds of delegates that were waiting in the conference room for the panel session at 7am when I got into the convention centre! Americans take the adage of work hard/play hard to new extremes, with many of them looking rather the worse for wear after a big night on the Vegas Strip, but still very much there and ready to do business on what must have been only a few hours sleep the next day.

It was great to be part of the panel session with some good questions put to us by the moderator on omni channel, the future of retail, property investment, innovation and other topics. As I was representing European retail, questions on the Eurozone inevitably came up, linked to retailers' current appetite for expansion within and beyond the European marketplace. It is clear listening to the other panellists that retail faces similar challenges around the world, though each country/region has its own particular issues, such as import duties in Brazil discouraging retailers to invest there, or lack of quality infrastructure in India, which presents significant logistical challenges.

Overall though the mood at the session and also during the first day of RECon itself was upbeat. Attendance numbers are well up on previous years and currently tracking ahead of pre-2008 levels. Delegates here, whilst mindful of the lessons learnt post-Lehman, seem to be looking forward to the future with positivity. The key word being used here is 'growth' in contrast to an extent with the UK where business sentiment seems to be a little less upbeat at present. However, it is only a matter of time - given how closely linked the UK and Europe are to the US - before that positivity begins to permeate into UK retail. It's about time too given we are currently in one of the longest downturns in the economic cycle since records began!

The convention centre itself is hugely impressive, with some opulent stands on display. There are three separate areas spread over the 1m sq ft exhibition space - each one of which could comfortably accommodate the entirety of the Mapic 'bunker.' Today was very much about pre-arranged client meetings as given the sheer size of the venue randomly bumping into people you hope to meet simply isn't feasible in the way it is at BCSC, Mapic or any of the European conferences. CBRE alone have brought circa 800 delegates from around the world, which gives you an idea of the scale of the event.  My meetings today were very much back to back, and mainly with retailers - many of which aren't currently present in the UK and Europe but are interested in the market, or have a fledgling presence but want to expand further. Some good new names coming to a retail centre near you soon - watch this space!"

Guest Post: RECon 2013, Las Vegas - Day One.

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
J De Mello.JPG

RECon 2013, the global shopping centre market conference, is upon us again. And more than 30,000 industry figures are descending on Las Vegas for the summit this year. CBRE's head of retail consultancy, Jonathan De Mello, has sent his first report from the front line. Expect to hear more from him on this blog over the next four days.

"In a taxi on my way to Gatwick and RECon 2013 and very excited about my first ever trip out to what is the biggest get together of retail and property professionals in the world. I have attended MAPIC every year over the last 10 years, but everything I have heard about RECon is that it - in true American style - is a supersized version of that - on steroids with a huge side order of fries!

Sunday is CBRE's Cabana party at the Wynn pool, which unfortunately I am going to miss as my plane won't get into Vegas in time. The whole idea of networking in your swimming trunks by the pool is quite alien to us Brits, and probably with good reason given the average fitness level of Brits in property is likely to be sub-Vegas poolside standard! However, I am looking forward to the CBRE opening cocktail party at the Encore later - to catch up with a number of clients that are attending the event from around the world as well as CBRE colleagues I haven't seen for some time.

Looking ahead, these opening events are definitely the calm before the storm, with a whirlwind series of back to back winner takes all 30 minute meetings from Monday morning onwards into Wednesday when everyone heads home. Monday morning at 7am is the Global Delegates breakfast, and I am honoured to be part of a panel there representing Europe, with panellists also there from the US, Asia, and Latin America. It should be a good session given the questions that have been circulated in advance on the impact of omni channel and other topics, and I am hoping to provide some insight to delegates on these topics from a European perspective. If you are reading this blog and attending RECon, it would be great to see you there bright and early on Monday morning!

Approaching Gatwick now in record time - thanks to an 'out there' cab driver that sees speed limits more as guidelines than statutory law!"

Yesterday's Estates Gazette/BCSC Retail Summit gave the strongest impression yet that the industry is ready to cut loose the chains of its troublesome recent history, and focus on creating a bright and prosperous future.

The most stark indication of this attitude came from Distressed Property Taskforce chairman Mark Williams, who said categorically that the industry group was focused solely on the future - and it looks like being one borne of something of a revolution in retail property. 

Williams said what everyone already knows - that there is an oversupply of retail space in this country; but added that in some locations the oversupply is by a factor of around 50%, and that levels of regeneration not seen since World War II are necessary to recalibrate the retail market in those long-suffering locales.

Last year's BCSC Conference was laden with references to 'managing' town centres as one would a major shopping centre - and that theme was heavily expanded on yesterday. New River Retail's Charles Miller told the room that investment in a major mall is not just about what you're buying, but the surrounding area; and how crucial it is to create fusion, rather than friction, between the two.

It was mentioned on numerous occasions by more than one speaker that fractured town centre ownership is stymieing the requisite improvement in high streets, and engenders the old-style laissez-faire landlordship once leases are secured. 

In the interest of combating such attitudes, Peter Brett Associates launched their 'Town Centre Investment Management' (TCIM) initiative during the afternoon session. It is designed with the expressed intention of bringing investment back into the high street by using an adapted form of Local Authorities' CPO powers to bring about uniformity of town centre ownership.

Whilst these aren't necessarily new ideas, the belief is that with the momentum currently behind town centre regeneration and the ongoing political discussions around the subject, now could be the best time to force political will in the direction of supplying proper solutions to those well-documented town centre problems.

Political will could yet prove to be the greatest stumbling block to securing that bright future for the retail industry. Consents still fly in for out-of-town developments, occasionally going against the recommendation of planning officers, and there was a palpable scepticism in the room when asked if Local Authorities had the collective desire to make a policy such as TCIM work in the long term.

BCSC President and Chaiman Marcus Kilby said in his summary of the day's discussions that 2013 could yet be the year looked back on in a decade or so as the year in which the retail industry began its crucial evolution into an overwhelming success story. The first shoots of that evolution are present, without question; but there remain several overarching caveats that must be addressed before that first great leap forward.

Trinity Leeds prepares for lift-off

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

Today brings the end of a barren spell in the UK retail market that has not been experienced for some time. All eyes are on Yorkshire as Land Securities delivers its mammoth 1,000,000 sq ft Trinity Leeds - some 555 days after Boris Johnson cut the ribbon at Westfield Stratford.

Such a drought in the development pipeline would have surely been unthinkable back in the halcyon days of 2008 - a year which saw Westfield London and Grosvenor's Liverpool One amongst twelve new malls to open in the UK.

The drop down to 'zero' in 2012 can be attributed to an overwhelming litany of factors - economic difficulties for both retailers and developers, a lack of adequate funding, anchor-store pull-outs, 're-evaluation' of planning proposals, refusal of planning proposals, decreasing consumer confidence and the mall-crushing behemoth of on-line retail are only a handful. Essentially, the story is that the fall in new retail development over the past five years is one of the starkest representations of what the global economic crisis has done to this country.

Nonetheless, today should be a celebration of UK retail and its ever-increasing adaptability to difficult circumstances. There have been a lot of noises coming from Land Securities about Trinity Leeds being seen as an 'experience' destination - rather than simply a place to shop. This could ultimately determine the level of the mall's success, as developers increasingly look towards leisure and catering services to help boost footfall and tempt customers away from the convenience of shopping on the internet.

The opening comes at a time when UK retail desperately needs a shot in the arm. Yesterday's budget left the calls to re-think the business rate revaluation delay unanswered, and retailers facing a £175 million additional rates bill in April. This comes off the back of a dismal January which saw three major retail chains falling into administration, causing 10,000 jobs to be put at immediate risk as around 1,000 stores faced the axe.

All that can be put to one side today, as Land Securities can enjoy the fruit of a very long, and at times arduous, labour. Having downed-tools in 2009, you would have got extremely long odds on them opening a 90%-let scheme in March 2013, complete with the first Everyman cinema in the north of the country, in addition to a string of highly-sought-after retailers and catering outlets. It's a huge credit to them, and to Leeds as a whole, that they have done so.

Momentum for Coventry's retail future

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
News broke yesterday of Friargate Coventry LLP's agreement with landscape architect Gross Max to deliver the public realm of their gigantic 37-acre development to the south of the city centre.

The office-led development is now set to get underway later this year - bringing 2.4 million sq ft of new office space to south Coventry, in addition to over 200,000 sq ft of retail.

This is one of three schemes in Coventry City centre which promise a total of around 1 million sq ft of newly-built retail space - the other two being Barberry's proposed redevelopment of the Royal Mail sorting office on Bishop Street; and the mammoth project adjacent to Friargate being undertaken by Coventry City Council and Aviva.

The image below shows the location & scale of these projects; with Friargate outlined in red, the city centre development outlined in blue, and Barberry's site in Orange.

Coventry.JPG
Despite being the UK's 11th-largest city, Coventry currently lags in 49th position nationwide according to retail spend - and so the need for an overhaul of an enormous chunk of the city centre is of paramount importance to ensuring a successful future for this under-performing Midlands giant.

The notion of work getting underway on Friargate by the end of this year is encouraging to say the least. By that time, a development partner ought to have been secured for Aviva's retail-led city centre scheme, and that staggering total of 1 million sq ft of new retail space may take another giant leap closer to becoming a reality.

'Westfield Croydon' application registered

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

Last month's seminal announcement over Croydon's retail future led me, among many others, to ponder over what the exact specifications of the new joint venture project would be.

I suggested that a new application towards the end of 2013 might take on the guise of Hammerson's "Whitgift Quarter" proposals, spanning across Croydon's two mammoth retail developments, Centrale and Whitgift, rather than separate applications for each scheme.

It appears I was wrong.

Two weeks ago, Croydon Council registered (for the first time) the full application lodged in September by Westfield, after having put forward a scoping opinion a couple of months prior. The applicant is now listed on the (amended) application form as 'Westfield Shoppingtowns Limited & Hammerson UK Properties PLC':

Hammerfield.bmp

Strangely, the applicant listed on the 'application details' has changed over the weekend from the above to simply 'Westfield Shopping Towns Limited'. What we read into that, I don't know.

All documents within the newly-registered application make occasional reference to Centrale's role in the Croydon facelift, and make almost no mention of Hammerson at all! It's also interesting that the Design & Access statement for 'Westfield Croydon' (!) makes a pointed reference to the successful regeneration of King's Cross as being a precedent for a redevelopment of this scale.

So it appears that Hammerson is happy to "piggy-back" onto Westfield's concept for the Whitgift Centre redevelopment, having already secured consent in May 2012 to part-redevelop Centrale into a distinctly mixed-use mall.

Can we conclude, therefore, that the project will move forward as a double-pronged concept? Will the Westfield-branded shopping mall outlined in the new application come to pass? Can the 170,000 sq ft of leisure space proposed by Westfield coexist with the 99,000 sq ft currently permitted at Centrale?

If the answer to all of these is 'yes', then the exciting announcement made in January may not, in fact, yield an organic regeneration brainwave concocted by two retail heavyweights - but actually simply serve as a catalyst to accelerate two separate projects which could possibly have come to pass independently.

I suppose I would just be a little disappointed that the 'vision' for Croydon might simply turn out to be a staccato amalgamation of separate concepts, as opposed to an inspired 'meeting-of-minds' development spanning over both malls which could truly rubber-stamp the identity of the unique joint venture on the south London town. 

If the development is to be as described herein, then the key piece of cross-party co-operation will come in ensuring the complementary nature of the retail and leisure offer across both redeveloped schemes. 'Hammerfield' must ensure that the newly created "Quarter" evolves as a singular, functional retail core, and not as one entity prospering at the expense of the other.

Major New Schemes Join the Pipeline

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

With the apparent dearth of new retail schemes due to grace the 'completions' list in the near future, it might come as pleasant news to learn that over the past month, EGi's Retail Scheme database welcomed four new major developments comprising a total of over 600,000 sq ft of new retail space. Click the icons on the map below for more details on each (zoom out to see all icons):


Whilst you wouldn't classify these as 'traditional' retail schemes, they are nonetheless indicative of a growing trend in the retail development world - namely, to build new space as part of a mixed-use scheme, rather than restricting projects to A1 use. Indeed, we are now even seeing owners of high-profile malls look to alternative uses to help fill vacant space and increase customer numbers (in addition to dwell time). 

Of particular interest is the proposal just north of Dunstable, known in the official council document as the "strategic urban extension of Houghton Regis" It reminds me of a similar proposal I blogged about in November 2011 - an entirely new town on the Hoo Peninsula, to be known as Lodge Hill

That particular scheme is still without outline approval after 15 months, so with that in mind I'll hold off on predictions as to when all this retail space will complete. It's encouraging, however, to know that despite all the well-documented struggles facing the retail market, there remains the ambition of developers and councils to keep faith with large-scale retail schemes - even if, going forward, retail space has to settle for being a constituent part of a mixed-use project, rather than the headline act of a single-use mall.

Croydon Impasse Finally Resolved.

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
A new year brings new allegiances, and if 2013 brings a more noteworthy one than the Westfield/Hammerson joint venture announced today, it might well cause the property industry to implode.

So many column inches last year were dedicated to the 'impasse' between the two heavyweights over the proposed redevelopment of Croydon's Whitgift Centre - and with it, the potential to dominate South London's retail and leisure scene for the foreseeable future.

The origin of the feud came via this story in November 2011, when it was announced that Westfield had began exclusive discussions over the scheme redevelopment with freeholder and 25% long leaseholder, The Whitgift Foundation. Fellow long leaseholders, Royal London Asset Management and Anglo Irish Bank didn't take too kindly to this being announced without their blessing, and so backed Centrale owner Hammerson to oversee the regeneration of both malls.

Since then, we've had 14 months of carefully-designed surveys, various planning applications, 'battle lines' being drawn, mayoral opinions, and even presidential election-esque tactics, as each developer strained to one-up its rival. But now, thankfully, we have a resolution.

A press conference taking place this morning will reveal more details behind the joint venture's proposals for Croydon, so it's unclear at present if existing planning applications or consents will be factored into the £1 billion regeneration project. 

Hammerson obtained permission in May 2012 to reconfigure 140,000 sq ft of retail space at Centrale into an 11-screen cinema, two flagship retail stores and eight restaurant units. For its part, Westfield has lodged an application for the redevelopment of the Whitgift Centre, with 1.3 million sq ft of retail space, and 150,000 sq ft dedicated to leisure. 

One would, however, anticipate an entirely new proposal to be lodged - and I imagine that it will be Hammerson's "Whitgift Quarter" - an amalgamation of both schemes - that provides the blueprint for the joint venture to take forward.

In any event, it's terrific news for Croydon residents and Croydon Council after over a year of uncertainty - they have two heavyweight developers with an unrivalled wealth of combined expertise in how to build large, successful schemes. Lets hope that the joint venture yields more than the sum of its parts, and that the town can finally live up to its enormous potential.

Guest Post: Outdoor Media and Retail Property

| 1 Comment | No TrackBacks
Katrin Robinson.JPG

In a climate where shop vacancy levels are continually on the increase, it may come as a pleasant surprise to hear that demand for prime billboard space in busy retail destinations remains high. Large-format outdoor advertising sites can generate important new and incremental revenue streams for retailers, landlords and managing agents, explains blowUp Media Group Managing Director, Katrin Robertson.

For advertisers, getting their brands noticed at the point-of-sale when people are in a buying mode is of paramount importance for influencing buyer behaviour. Therefore non-traditional outdoor advertising sites in and around shopping malls and bustling High Street locations are highly sought after.


For retail landlords, giant banners, building wraps and even digital screens, can also offer a great way to secure vacant premises, contain and fund restoration work, beautify city centres and generally leverage advertising revenue from existing properties on a short term or ongoing basis.

Thumbnail image for Banner 1.bmp

Banners can help to disguise vacant properties and keep an area looking bright and vibrant rather than appearing empty or run down. This helps to keep rent prices buoyant in the area and can form an important bridging gap when properties are not leased.

Building wraps also offer excellent protection during shop renovations, concealing unsightly building work and keeping the high street looking clean and tidy.

On a practical level building wraps can encase scaffolding and protect passers-by from the mess and noise of building work. The light weight mesh materials of the wrap also allows light to permeate the property beneath.

Building wraps can mimic the original façade and showcase what the property will look like once renovations are complete. Printed façades can be important for historic buildings requiring long term repair work. Ad revenue can help to fund conservation projects and contribute towards city beautification, as was the case during restoration work carried out to the historic Tower of London.

Banner 3.bmp

For retailers, banners can provide powerful brand building opportunities that ensure their premises stand out from the crowd. During the Games, a hot bed for gigantic banners and eye catching building wraps, John Lewis wrapped several key stores across the UK to highlight its role as the Official Department Store Provider to the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games. Their flagship store wrap (right) consisted of a 4,000 square foot Union Flag, highly visible along Oxford Street at a time when visitors to London swelled to over 10 million.

Outdoor advertising sites can provide long term opportunities for landlords in areas with significant footfall and proximity to retail destinations. More advertisers are embracing digital signage as a way of bringing their brand stories to life using full motion video.  Digital delivers cut through and brings new flexibility to Out of Home, and has the additional benefit of being remotely update-able at the click of a button. Digital signage also enables multiple advertising campaigns to run consecutively with the potential to earn higher ad revenues.

Banner 2.bmp

When looking for an outdoor specialist to partner with, property specialists should look for a one stop shop to help realise their project from conception through to delivery.  Generally speaking, Giant Posters need approval from the authorities, so selecting a company with both an in depth understanding of planning permissions and excellent relationships with local authorities is a must. Operational experience, safety track records and sales acumen are all integral to ensuring your site looks good and is constantly earning ad revenue.

Well executed banners can lift an area by creating clean, bright, modern looking spaces. Great advertising campaigns are also well received, fun and create 'talk-ability' amongst the public. Done well, outdoor advertising can generate significant returns for landlords looking to leverage their portfolios.

BlowUP media specialise in large-scale outdoor advertising, and currently manage over 300 locations - the largest such network in Europe.

http://www.blowup-media.co.uk/

NPPF: Six months on.

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

September 27th marked the six-month anniversary of the implementation of the government's new planning policy framework; designed ostensibly to simplify the planning system, protect the environment and, perhaps most crucially, to promote sustainable development.

With an entire section within the guidelines devoted to 'Ensuring the Vitality of Town Centres', the framework was also designed (albeit less pointedly) to stymie the proliferation of major out-of-town retail schemes, and lend another government hand to the long wished-for recovery of Britain's urban centres.

The full impact of the new framework won't be fully realised for some time; however, six months on, we can perhaps begin to assimilate an understanding of how the new guidelines are shaping retail planning (if at all) - and in particular the impact so far on out-of-town developments.

The criteria for inclusion in the following study were that the applications either have to be for new out-of-town retail developments measuring over 50,000 sq ft with three units or more, or for extensions to existing developments of that nature.

The charts below show the number of applications submitted between April 15th and July 15th over the last three years, and the combined sizes of all proposals:

What these charts signify is that although the number of applications has reduced compared to last year, the total amount of space has hardly dropped off at all - there are still several major applications for out-of-town space being lodged even with the new framework in mind. 2010 saw a similar overall number of applications to 2012, but for only around 60% of the amount of space applied for this year.

The pie charts below indicate the status of these proposals as of September 27th in each respective year:

In the two years preceding the NPPF, 50% or more of the applications submitted between April 15th and July 15th had been approved by September 27th. In 2012, only 33% of applications (5) had been given the thumbs-up by that date. This is in addition to one of the proposals having already been refused - which did not happen in 2011 or 2010. Whilst we can't assess the exact role of the NPPF in every individual application; it seems fair to say that the new guidelines are having an impact when it comes to the final outcomes of out-of-town proposals.

This theory is backed up by the chart below, which indicates the average time taken (within the 15th April - 27th September parameter) for the applications to be decided:

2012's average is a significant increase on those of 2010 and 2011, and may go some way to explaining the higher proportion of applications without decisions. As authorities adjust to operating the mechanics of decision making within the guidelines of the new proposals, delays to decisions are to be expected. This might also be due to different interpretations of the nuances of the planning framework causing developers to further explain why their proposal constitutes a 'sustainable development', and for objectors to counter that with reasons to explain why it doesn't.

Moving forwards, I will be interested to keep an eye on the undecided applications thus far from 2012 - as they represent 77% of the total space applied for. Of the undecided applications from 2010, 50% of the space was eventually permitted, whilst the 2011 figure is 29% (40% still without an outcome).

In twelve months' time, it will be of interest to see what proportion of the as-yet-undecided space has got the go-ahead, the percentage refused permission, and also how much has been either withdrawn or even superseded. I'll also be curious to see the number and scale of out of town proposals lodged during a full eighteen months of NPPF implementation.

I said at the outset that the full impact of the new planning framework is still to be realised - but there are certainly some visible trends so far that it is having an impact upon decision making, even if from a spatial point of view it hasn't quite dampened developers' tendencies to look beyond the urban perimeter for expansion opportunities. This may come further down the line, however, when the NPPF regulations mean a higher proportion of out-of-town applications are either turned down or left unresolved for an unpalatable length of time.


(All Sources: EGi Planning)

TIAA-CREF jumps to the top of the leaderboard...

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
It was confirmed today that US pension fund, TIAA-CREF has completed its £280m purchase of Basingstoke's Festival Place. The deal becomes the largest retail investment transaction to complete in 2012, overtaking (by some distance) Hermes' £159m deal in February to take full ownership of three schemes previously part-owned by Westfield:


The fund ought to enjoy its position at the top of the tree while it lasts, as British Land and London & Stamford's chart-distorting £1.2 billion sale of Meadowhall ought to complete at some point in the very near future.

Westfield Bradford: A new dawn, or a repeated cycle?

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
For Bradford residents, last month's announcement that Marks & Spencer and Next had agreed deals to anchor Westfield's proposed mega-mall in their city might have given them a sense of deja-vu.

The news would have sounded strikingly similar to something they may also have heard in May 2008, since which time the project has suffered almost irreversible damage at the hands of the recession, leading many in the town to abandon hope that the proposed scheme will ever get built.

Construction on the development was abandoned in February 2009, and the 12-acre site has lain vacant ever since. The 'hole-in-the-ground' is encircled by graffiti-plastered hoardings which illustrate in no uncertain terms the level of resentment felt in the town towards Westfield - initially latent, now vociferous - and exacerbated in no small part by the Australian developer's financial commitments to their schemes in the south.

The battle to redevelop Croydon's Whitgift Centre now appears to be at the forefront of Westfield's plans for the U.K. - with the developer claiming it is ready to spend £1 billion on the project. It emerged yesterday that the company wants to treble that investment across the UK - but with an expressed focus on London-based developments. 

A parody Westfield Bradford twitter account commented: "Westfield's £3bn commitment includes Bradford...to the tune of £12.70...including VAT", before adding: "...there is actually no evidence Westfield wants to spend £12.70 in Bradford - sorry if I got your hopes up."

This rather accurately summarises the sentiment in Bradford surrounding Westfield. They have had to stand by whilst the company plunged around £1,743m into Westfield Stratford City, simultaneously scaling down the Bradford project from a £350m scheme into a £275m scheme - all against the backdrop of a big, empty patch of land in their city centre. Now, with Westfield claiming to be looking at a £3bn investment in the UK, there remains no real indication that we won't be back here again in four years, with retailers once again re-affirming their commitment to a mall which only exists on paper, in a city exasperated by endless setbacks.

I've no doubt that Westfield are doing all they can to deliver the Bradford scheme, and they will point to the fact that the anchor deals are for the revised development given permission last October, indicating that the scheme remains deliverable. However; until the mall is open and thriving, the Yorkshire city's level of contempt, frustration and despair will remain ardent - and even then, it might not fully disappear.
Enhanced by Zemanta

NPPF and an Oxfordshire squabble.

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
At the beginning of last month, I mentioned on Twitter that LXB Retail's Banbury Gateway was the subject of some Planning-Policy based protests from owners of town centre schemes, concerned that the development would have an adverse impact on town centre vitality in the long run.

The interactive map below gives a concise summary of the positions held by each of the scheme owners (click the icons for information, zoom out & drag to view all three):


The main criticism being aimed at LXB's proposed 295,000 sq ft development is that the sequential assessment undertaken by the developer is unsatisfactory, as it complies with the requirements of 2009's Planning Policy Statement 4 (PPS4), rather than the National Planning Policy Framework published in March. As such, there is the assertion that LXB cannot adequately demonstrate that the scheme is a sustainable development that will lead to sustainable growth, nor can it prove to a satisfactory level that it will not have a detrimental impact on Banbury town centre. Therefore, the application should be refused under paragraph 27 of the new planning policy framework.

LXB argue that the test was indeed adequate, as was agreed by the Local Planning Authority, and that the guidelines stated on such matters by the new policy framework are broadly consistent with the requirements it has already satisfied. They say that scheme does not stymie any current town centre investment plans, and cannot be shown to have a material adverse effect on nearby centres.

The application for the scheme was submitted in December 2011, and as such is one of many that is currently under consideration amid the backdrop of the NPPF without the legislation being in place when the proposals were being formalised. Many elements of this particular application were tailored to the draft NPPF from June 2011, but that will not sate the incandescence of protesters who feel that the framework validates the Town Centre First initiative more than ever, and to dismiss policy-based criticism of proposals submitted prior to its formal implementation is almost to discredit it altogether.

This is why I feel that this particular issue is one of a few developing around the country which may prove to make or break the new framework. From the point of view of those opposed to the scheme, LXB has adhered to planning and sequential requirements which, similar as they might be, are not exactly like those outlined in the NPPF, and as such it ought to be incumbent upon them to demonstrate under the new guidelines that their scheme ensures town centre prosperity, rather than jeopardises it.

From the point of view of LXB, they have adhered to the planning constraints and followed necessary guidelines in order to acquire the resolution to grant permission verdict precisely one day before the new framework was published. Does the NPPF dictate that they must carry out all of these necessary assessments again? Are Cherwell Council likely to use the new framework to delay the delivery of the scheme - and with it, the relocation of Prodrive?

My view is that the scheme will probably go ahead as stated in the original application, but with a series of section 106 conditions which would hopefully ensure the satisfaction of all parties - specifically, that the scheme is linked to the town centre by public transport, and perhaps an amnesty on securing any more retailers with a town centre presence to the scheme (if that's possible to enforce).

Either way, the outcome will provide no small amount of insight into how strictly local planning authorities are willing to enforce the new framework - and may set precedents for similar proposals nationwide.
Enhanced by Zemanta
The Local Government Association published a survey earlier this month which tackles the issue of high street 'clustering', which I have blogged about before on here, and once again it is of little surprise to see such things heavily lamented by council members. What I find particularly interesting about this survey, however, is the type of premises that councillors feel will help most to regenerate struggling high streets.

The officers rate books and clothes stores, restaurants, and local butchers and bakers highest with over 90% of those surveyed claiming these types of outlets were the most important elements needed to help restore the future vitality of Britain's high streets. Surprisingly, however, only 68% seemed to think that leisure elements such as cinemas and bowling alleys were of importance to ensuring town centre recovery.

The results seem to largely ignore the fact that supermarkets have largely made the traditional high street model redundant via a combination of favourable parking provision and unbeatable prices over a sustained period of time, perhaps pointing to a degree of romanticism. This feeling doesn't appear to be shared by developers and shopping centre owners nationwide.

Legal & General's Castle Place Market in Trowbridge; Harbourside Developments' Telford Shopping Centre; Capital Shopping Centres' Potteries Centre in Stoke and Key Properties' Kingsmead Centre in Farnborough have all received permission since the start of 2012 for either a cinema-led extension, or a reconfiguration of existing space to accommodate a cinema. Not to mention the plans submitted in February by Hammerson to develop almost 90,000 sq ft of leisure and restaurant space at Centrale, in Croydon.

Whilst these are only a handful of examples, they represent the major retail developers' recognition of how beneficial leisure space can be in a town centre scheme. On the surface, cinemas and bowling alleys, to use the survey's examples, are footfall-drivers and dwell-time boosters; but, crucially, they also offer at least an imitation of the social aspect of town centre shopping that has perhaps been lost through the proliferation of supermarkets.

If town centres are indeed to recover to the level we want them to, they have to provide something that is unattainable in out-of-town schemes or even on-line. This, regrettably, puts an arrow in the idea that the traditional high-street model can be revived, but it gives license to look towards a model that can ensure future success by driving shoppers into the centre of towns to engage in activities besides shopping.

Developers seem to have cottoned on to this notion - and perhaps it's time councils did too.
It's telling that the responses from the British Retail Consortium and BCSC to yesterday's new planning guidelines were altogether more positive than those given less than a week ago following the budget. 

The main section of the significantly-condensed planning document which would concern retailers and developers is that which deals with the future vitality of town centres, and how planning guidelines can assist the market in making vibrant, competitive, successful centres a reality; and not just a celebrity's dream.

It was pleasing to see the document make reference to the individuality of town centres, and recognise that local authorities need to govern what constitutes sustainable development in their area. The authorities can define the extent of their town centres, and develop their area plans around these parameters. This in turn will mean a greater power to refuse permission to schemes which are seen as being detrimental to the progress of urban recovery, and thereafter, development.

In strengthening the Town Centre First mechanism, the framework has certainly put faith in the long-term ability of struggling town centres to recover - but in terms of shopping and retail, the question remains whether the problems are too endemic for a planning reform to fix. Several planning hurdles may have been removed for town centre retail schemes from a development point of view - but can consumer behaviour change enough to make them 'viable' and 'sustainable'? And how many retailers will survive until the benefits of the guidelines are felt?

The public often give their backing to retail-led regeneration schemes in town centres, only to then either vote with their wallet and shop on-line, or to drive to the out-of-town retail park, where the stores are larger and the parking free. There also needs to be a little more help given to retailers in the battle to pay rent (an opportunity missed in the budget); as there is little point in making the delivery of a gleaming new project easier if there is nobody there to fill it.

The next couple of years will be of interest - as we observe just how quickly the reforms catch on, and how many schemes are turned down due to failing the requisite impact assessments. Only then might we see retailers, developers and, crucially, shoppers turn their eye towards the town centre rather than away from it. The NPPF may be seen as the first step towards town centre recovery - but make no mistake - there's a marathon still to run.

Related Posts:

Supermarkets: Good, Bad, Or just too convenient?

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
EGi this week reported some good news for the supermarket investment market via a report from IPD; which indicated that it was one of the fastest-growing commercial property sectors. This is the first time that IPD has grouped supermarkets in an investment category of their own when conducting its retail investment research - and much can be read into the fact that supermarkets appear to represent a much less risky prospect for investors than other retail assets, as well as offering a higher return than other prospective investments.

Good news, then, for anyone looking to dive into supermarket ownership - and also for any of the big four seeking to boost their expansion trail by divesting themselves of any owner-occupied premises - but what might this mean for the wider retail market?

Henry Porter launched a scathing attack on supermarkets on Sunday - calling for a 'Leveson enquiry for supermarkets' to attempt to prevent these retail behemoths from, as he sees it, fattening our children, ruining town centres, causing illiteracy, encouraging alcoholism and re-introducing a form of slave labour in order to boost profits.

So, to anyone of a similar persuasion to Porter, the IPD report should make for worrying reading; as with a dearth of truly healthy investment options currently available - it could foreshadow another unstoppable extension of the power wielded by superstores.

A common argument in defence of supermarket proliferation is that we, the consumers, are complicit in their expansion by opting to give in to their lower prices and higher levels of convenience - but what happens when those factors have such force that they destroy all existing competition, removing the element of choice entirely?

Testimony from Barnstaple last year tells a typical and all-too-often heard story of how the fanfares that greeted the arrival of a new Tesco Extra were soon drowned out by the 'high street closures' klaxon just months down the line; and residents have now taken matters into their own hands - petitioning North Devon Council to stop any further supermarkets coming to the town. They are not alone, with dozens of campaigns nationwide now actively seeking to discourage supermarkets from operating in their area.

Whilst I wouldn't go as far as Porter has, and lay the blame a disproportionate amount of the world's ills squarely at the door of Tesco-et-al; the Government may well want to look a little more closely at this issue, and possibly stymie the growth of supermarkets in certain areas in order to give town centres a better chance of recovery. 

Burlington Arcade restoration begins

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

Regular readers of our retail blog will recall an earlier entry on the brewing row between owners and tenants of the Burlington Arcade on Piccadilly, W1, over plans to breath new life into the building.

Meyer Bergman, the European real estate firm that bought the Grade II-listed arcade in October 2010, has now revealed the first pictures of proposed new restoration works following the receipt of Planning and Listed Building Consent.

 

 

 

Burlington Arcade 1.JPGWork has now started and the first phase, which will focus on restoring the upper elements of the arcade, is expected to be complete by the end of April. It involves the installation of up-lighting and the re-painting of the painted elements in the original ecru white colour used in 1819 when the arcade first opened. 

Work is being undertaken out of trading hours to allow shopkeepers to remain open for business throughout the process.

 

 

 

Burlington Arcade 2.JPGMarkus Meijer, chief executive of Meyer Bergman, Burlington Arcade's co-owner, said: "We expect these works to be complete in time for the Queen's Diamond Jubilee celebrations and I am particularly excited that, once complete, we will have a view not seen for over 100 years and possibly not since Queen Victoria celebrated her Diamond Jubilee in 1897."

 

Big Brother Debate Sparks Unnecessary Fuss

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
No, not the "celebrity" one.

There has been some furore recently emanating from human rights groups over the 'revelation' that shoppers' behavioural patterns are being tracked within retail schemes via their mobile phones.

It appears that, in a bid to better understand consumer behaviour, some of the major players in the market have advocated the tracking of mobile phones within their malls, indicating how shoppers operate. As the story has broken, it has inevitably sparked a 'Big Brother'-esque paranoia, despite the technology being categorically unable to store phone numbers, messages, internet history or any other personal information.

Upon reading what the technology does - I thought of it like this: You go into a mall, and Mr. Eye-in-the-sky stops seeing you as a human being with a past, two parents and a set of organs, and instead sees a neon cube with an identity code. Cube 30496745 then does X,Y,Z - leaves the mall, and then goes back to being a person.

The response to the use of tracking technology would suggest that there is a swat team on the roof of every mall in the country, waiting for the tracker to feed it something like: "Graham Shone just used a 'Next' voucher, then had a coffee - he's clearly a terrorist - move! move! move!". Perhaps its a personal thing, but I have no problem at all with anyone knowing where and in what order I do my shopping. In fact, good luck to them. My last trip to Westfield was so scattergun it would probably break the computer.

Using this technology is basically a more comprehensive and time-saving way of conducting surveys. The tracking is not designed to pigeon-hole individuals, but to create a better environment and experience for the collective. In addition, the technology is not only used in retail - as this eye-opening news item testifies. Why not embrace everything you can to help improve life for you and your customers?

A simplistic view, perhaps, but if you're that worried about your phone being tracked while you shop, then leave it at home - or switch it off. Yes, there are limits as to what should be monitored, but in my opinion this doesn't get near them. And think about this - if you're paying by card for your shopping, then surely your bank has even more sensitive information than Land Securities or Westfield will ever get hold of.
Thumbnail image for Keighley Retail.JPG
My attention was drawn earlier this week to an application by Stainsby Grange to construct a 
new retail scheme in Keighley. The development will be called 'Worth Valley Shopping Centre', and already has its own website, detailing which brands the company are hoping to entice to the scheme. The developers have indicated that this development is designed to complete Keighley's 'natural retail loop', illoustrated on the right.

This loop already contains two major retail schemes: The Cavendish Retail Park and The Airedale Centre, both mentioned in the retail statement accompanying the application as being infeasible sites for redevelopment as they contain a tenant mix committed to medium and long-term leases. A new mall, therefore, was seen as the key to moving Keighley's retail status forward, and rubber-stamping the town as the primary retail destination in the Airedale corridor, and after a six-year land acquisition process, Stainsby Grange have now gone 

Tying in nicely with my previous blog, the developers have, admirably, taken pains to explicitly write in the Design and Access statement that social media has been embraced, with the creation of www.facebook.com/worthvalleyshoppingcentre. The site currently has 22 'likes' and 1 'talking about' - which isn't actually too bad for a shopping centre by comparison, but maybe a bit more promotion in the right areas is needed for the site to take off.

Worth Valley.JPG
If, as indicated, construction is due to begin in early 2013 it would be a welcome fillip for the retail development pipeline, which is looking rather shaky after the nearby Trinity Leeds completes. Additionally, £300 million worth of local investment combined with the creation of 500 jobs is nothing to sneeze at - particularly in an area that has been measurably blighted by the economic downturn.

The real test, of course, comes after opening; when we will be able to gauge if indeed Worth Valley has contributed to or detracted from the retail market in Keighley. Careful measures need to be taken to ensure that there is no temptation to draw trade away from Airedale or Cavendish, even if a further downturn in the retail market necessitates a shift in target occupiers.

Out with the football, in with the retail.

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
New Basingstoke Stadium.JPGAn interesting development in Basingstoke today; the local football club has decided to switch from the old Camrose stadium to a new 5,000-capacity ground adjacent to the Hilton Hotel in order to meet the requisite standards to play in a higher league.

The old ground will be sold off in order to fund the new £10 million arena, and turned into a new retail park, the size of which seems to have baffled our beloved BBC. They list the intended size of the new scheme as being 90,000 sq ft (27,432 sq m) - which is an astonishing mismatch of metric and imperial measurements to the tune of being wrong by 19,072 sq m!

I once met a Basingstoke resident who told me that the Camrose Stadium was, in fact, spelt entirely with capital letters in all local publications; and as such needed to be shouted at every mention. I look forward, therefore, to the planning, building and letting of the CAMROSE 
SHOPPING PARK, where all customers and staff will be forced to bellow at each other over every transaction, or face ejection from the premises.

Thumbnail image for Southend new ground.JPG
This is another example of the growing link between stadia and shopping arenas. In Milton Keynes, MK1 Shopping Park will be situated directly adjacent to the MK Dons stadium upon completion next autumn. Similarly, Southend United's new stadium (left) will feature 23,000 sq m (247,600 sq ft) of retail space to accompany flats, a hotel and a conference centre.


Coming soon to the Hoo Peninsula...

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
...An entirely new town! 

Medway Council this month received a planning application from The Defence Infrastructure Organisation, (c/o Land Securities and CB Richard Ellis), to turn the site outlined below into a new community:

LodgeHillScaleImage.jpg
At the centre of the 325-hectare site will be a new 35,000 square foot supermarket,
Thumbnail image for phase one lodge hill.JPG
 supplemented by a further 22,000 square feet of mixed-use retail. The offer is designed to support the occupants of some 5,000 new residential units in the new community who, presumably, will be instantly offered work in the 395,000 square feet of office space; and send their children to one of the FOUR newly-built schools.

So often we hear about town centres looking at redevelopment - it was a little novel to come across these plans; which seem to have eschewed the traditional option in favour of simply plonking a new urban centre on agricultural land. Judging by the photos on the enormous Design and Access statement supplied, the site has been little more than an abandoned train station, used in part for occasional military procedures. 


phase 2 lodge hill.JPG
The twenty-year development schedule may well render my 'Coming soon' title a little wayward. the images on the right display where and when this new community is going to spring up. These, of course, are outlines. The developers admit themselves that the growth engine for Lodge Hill will be residential development - an element which itself is governed almost entirely by market factors. Site preparation for the first set of new-build homes may not get underway until 2013, meaning that even at the most optimistic estimate, we won't see a completed urban centre until 2033.

Nonetheless, I look forward to viewing the series of reserved matters applications which will supplement this site. Strewn within the planning documents are references to other successful market communities from which all concerned with this project could take inspiration. 

Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for phase 3 lodge hill.JPG
The Pantiles, in Tunbridge Wells is used as an example of a retail hub within a market town supported ably by the residential community it serves. Also mentioned is Delft in Holland, a municipality whose rustic 13-century design embraced the existing layout of the land on which it stood, allowing for easy orientation via straight, grid-pattern streets. 

Design will be key in ensuring the scheme's success as a market town. Everything needs to be walkable, with little or no chance of sprawl occurring at the site edges; the layout of the town centre needs to encourage flexibility for building uses without running the risk of allowing overbearing architecture to encroach on the town's idiosyncrasies. 

We will have to wait and see just how long it takes for the outline application to get the thumbs-up, but with Medway Council's own economic targets looming over them, it is likely that they will endeavour to get this project off the ground sooner rather than later.


A brewing storm in Croydon

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

Poor Croydon. The town centre is crying out for a cohesive, coherent retail-led regeneration strategy but, judging by this week's events, I suspect it will be some time before a happy conclusion is reached.

 

Westfield's jubilation on Thursday that it is to act as a development partner to the Whitgift Foundation, which owns the freehold and a 25% long leasehold stake in the town's Whitgift shopping centre, was short lived. 

 

It transpired that Royal London and Irish Bank Resolution Corporation, formerly Anglo Irish Bank, which together own 75% of the long leasehold and the management of the mall, had no idea that Westfield and the Whitgift Foundation were striking a deal.

 

The new agreement has all the potential to frustrate IBRC in particular, since it has been advised by Jones Lang LaSalle throughout 2011 on a strategy both for its stake and the wider redevelopment of the Whitgift shopping centre.

 

The indications so far are that the brewing storm will accelerate Royal London and IBRC's ambitions to seek out their own development partner for the mall.

 

Now you can bet that Hammerson, the new owner of neighbouring shopping mall Centrale, and Minerva, which long held ambitions to develop out a neighbouring Croydon retail scheme, Park Place, will both be keeping a keen eye on proceedings. And firms including British Land, Land Securities, Capital Shopping Centres and Lend Lease have all flirted with the idea of investing in Croydon over the years.

 

So which investor - developer will catch Royal London and IBRC's eye? And what will be the reality of having potentially two parallel development agendas for one shopping centre?

 

 

For those familiar with the development of Croydon town centre, this will be just another twist in a long-running saga. But for those new to the scene: watch this space. You're in for a ride.

 

'Pound Shop' Taken to the Next Level.

| 1 Comment | No TrackBacks
The Financial Times reported today that some retailers have been offered absurdly cheap annual rents in order for landlords to avoid paying business rents on "un-lettable" high street units, with Dixons, Clinton Cards and charity shops among the beneficiaries. 

Concessions have to occur between lessor and lessee in a difficult retail market - but some landlords have decided to take things to the extreme by charging a nominal annual rent of £1 on these spaces. This means that for less than the price of milkbread, and butter, you can now plonk yourself in a vacant unit, and trade for twelve months. Just as long as you're somewhere dreary. And cold.

A little shocking, maybe; but surprising? Hardly. Landlords are spitting feathers over having to pay business rates on vacant high street units, which now make up over 14% of town centres in Britain. I suspect many would prefer to chew off their own arm than risk increasing this figure by sustaining rents at rates only befitting a strong retail market. What we're experiencing is anything but.

One man likely to be particularly aghast at this is Russian billionaire, Maxim Voznesensky, who has recently agreed a deal to take 249 sq ft on Old Bond Street for 18 years at £225,000 per annum - the equivalent of £903.61 per square foot every year. Some basic maths would indicate that this pitch is 225,000 times more desirable than those given away by landlords - yet I'm sure Mr Voznesensky is sitting with his FT and morning coffee, wondering if maybe he should have held out for a cheaper space in one of these cold, dreary locales.

Maybe things would be better if landlords in the housing market were forced into a similar position. The problem of decreasing disposable incomes would be solved, the retail market would be gloriously resurrected, the high street buoyant and town centres thriving - while malevolent, tyrannical house barons sob in a ditch.

I'm not holding my breath...

NSLSP Summary: Out-of-town on the rise...

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
CBRE have recently published their National Survey of Local Shopping Patterns (NSLSP) report, which indicates that although town centres still retain the majority of the population for comparison goods shopping, out-of-town destinations are slowly eating a larger chunk of the pie.

Analysing the period from 1998-2009, in which the population of the U.K. grew by 3.3 million, CBRE have identified which comparison goods trading locations have improved, and which have struggled out of over 3,000 destinations. 

Town centres have had their comparative market share reduced by around 4% in that time, despite the 1.64% increase in shopping population size. Out-of-town destinations, by contrast, now have an additional 9.6% of the population choosing them for comparison goods shopping - representing an increase in market share of an astounding 61%.

The survey cites three main causes of this paradigm shift, namely: retail mix change as a result of development activity; accessibility change brought about by transport innovations, and underlying population change. 

There is also an indication of a market squeeze, in which the top destinations will thrive, while others succumb to unfavourable market conditions. Of the new space developed in this period, 65% was in the top 200 locations, whereas 40% of other trading zones saw a loss of 4 million shoppers - the equivalent of £13 billion worth of trade disappearing.

Going forward, CBRE are adamant that fuel costs will have a more profound impact on retail than the internet. Shoppers currently tend to make fewer trips to larger centres but as fuel prices rise, we might see more and more affluent households deciding to stay at home to shop - following the lead of poorer households, who make up the majority of multi-channel consumers.

For an in-depth regional look at the winners and losers, see here.

Déjà vu at the Burlington Arcade

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

The brewing row between the owners and tenants of the Burlington Arcade on Piccadilly, W1, has a distinct sense of déjà vu about it.

 

More than 34,000 people backed a petition in January 2010 calling for action after 150 traders were ejected from Portobello Market, W11, in favour of an All Saints store.

 

They argued that the changes to Lipka's Arcade, undertaken by landlord Warren Todd, threatened the character of one of the capital's top tourist attractions and accused him of jeopardising the market in pursuit of high rents.

 

Fast forward more than a year and a half, and the same argument is now being thrashed out under the arches of the Grade II-listed arcade in Piccadilly.

 

Meyer Bergman and Thor Equities, the owners of the Burlington Arcade, are threatening to replace boutique retailers, some of whom have traded there for more than 50 years, with glitzy brands such as Jimmy Choo. They have also hired New York-based retail guru Peter Marino, famed for his black leather cap and sunglasses combo, to head up a reported £2.5m makeover of the arcade.

 

Daniel Bexfield, who has run a silver shop in the Burlington Arcade for 13 years, has branded the joint venture's plans for the arcade as "Dubai style" and Susanna Lovis, a specialist in Victorian and Edwardian jewellery, warns that it risks being turned into another Westfield mall.

 

As the mood at the arcade becomes increasingly sour and Bexfield's protest gathers momentum - film director Michael Winner recently waded in - it's hard to see an easy and peaceful solution to this familiar dispute.

 

Bargoed's Big Idea Becomes a Reality

| 1 Comment | No TrackBacks
Construction work on the retail element of the Bargoed Town Centre Regeneration project is set to begin next month, with Simons Group having recently exchanged the development agreement with Caerphilly Council on the £24 million scheme.

There will no doubt be stories this weekend that will grab more attention in South Wales, but once any short-term economic boost delivered by a victorious World Cup campaign fizzles out; the region would still be festering in dire economic circumstances.

The development has already delivered a new £25 million by-pass known as Angel Way to the East of the town centre, and a modern transport hub in northern Bargoed. The retail plateau is undoubtedly the crux of the project, and will provide a new Morrison's superstore measuring 56,000 sq ft and 7 supplementary retail units ranging from 1,700 sq ft to 5,250 sq ft. Perhaps the figure that will matter most to locals, however, is the provision of an estimated 300 new jobs in an area that suffered enormously following the recession, and is still lagging behind most areas of the U.K. in its recovery.

This video was produced in January 2011, highlighting the areas of the town to benefit from the scheme. Below are artists' impressions of how the new retail plateau will look:

Bargoed Image 1.jpg
Bargoed Image 2.jpg


I believe the key to the success of the scheme so far is it's viability. EGi reported today on a retail development site in Newcastle which has stalled, then re-started, and then stalled again - before being bought outright this year....and then stalling. The partnership of Simons and the Council, by contrast, have carefully tailored the project to the needs of Bargoed. It is a clear example of rejecting over-ambition in favour of realism - hopefully this will provide a template from which other developers can take inspiration.

For more info on the scheme, visit the official site here.

Brewery Square: On Film

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Brewery Square are clearly delighted with Wagamamas having signed for space at their scheme - the official website features an enormous splash confirming the deal, reported this week on EGi.

The website also features this wonderful construction timelapse film, which I thoroughly enjoyed, although you'll want to put your headphones in before taking a look...

Endorsements Aplenty for Stoke Proposals

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Stoke-on-Trent may not be the first place one would instinctively look for a positive retail story ahead of rent quarter day looming large at the end of this week, yet my attention has been drawn to two major developments in the Staffordshire Town's retail scene over the last fortnight.

First, Stoke resident and 15-time darts world champion Phil Taylor endorsed Realis Estates' re-branding and unveiling of their multi-million pound City Sentral scheme at BCSC this month; stating that he was particularly concerned about youth unemployment in Stoke, and that this kind of project would help to remedy that. There have been a few concerns from locals over the new name, and the fact that anchor tenant Marks and Spencer already has a presence in the town centre has raised a hint of antipathy, which Realis will have to dampen by attracting exciting mix of tenants at the 70 supplementary units. Perhaps most crucial to the plans will be the proposed 1,000 car parking spaces in addition to the re-vamp of the bus station, which ought to make access to the town centre a great deal easier. Taylor's resounding positivity may not be unilateral at the moment, but taking the long view - this scheme ought to benefit the town both economically, and aesthetically. 

More recently, Capital Shopping Centres received an almost unanimously positive verdict from visitors to The Potteries centre, after consultation postcards were distributed to shoppers asking for their opinion on the developer's plan to add 58,000 square feet of leisure space to the scheme by 2014. The survey resulted in a 99% approval rating for the plans, which include six new restaurant units and a cinema. A formal application is expected later this year for the extension, to be known as 'The Avenue', with 100 construction jobs to be provided once the proposal is given the thumbs-up.

Both Realis and CSC will be hoping that their respective proposals for Stoke can provide a fillip to a city that has recently experienced a mite of negative press, and will undoubtedly be inspired by the positive impacts that Bury and Wakefield experienced after major retail developments. The former jumped 59 places in the CACI 2011 retail footprint following the opening of The Rock in July last year, and Trinity Walk has helped to bump Wakefield up 48 positions. Given the level of investment mooted for both schemes, developers and residents must surely be looking to at least emulate those achievements in the Potteries.


About this Archive

This page is an archive of recent entries in the Developers category.

Deals is the previous category.

Development is the next category.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Other EG Bloggers